-
Story
-
Resolution: Done
-
Critical
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
Product / Portfolio Work
-
False
-
-
False
-
8
-
None
-
None
-
Sprint 238, Sprint 239, Sprint 240, Sprint 241, Sprint 242, Sprint 252
Goal
The goal of this user story is to describe the implementation details and alternative approaches for making the ingress operator optional. Main points to be described:
- ingress operator's capability (ies): route-api, gateway api
- usage of the cluster capability vs some other ingress configuration
- target platform requirement and differences: hypershift vs standalone
- all components dependent on the ingress operator
HyperShift engineering prefers the cluster capability to be the main mechanism for the ingress operator disabling/enabling. Same point is expressed by Ben Parees and generally agreed by the NetworkEdge team.
Out of scope
- Create a full fledged EP. The procedure of how to implement a new capability is already defined and described. This EP has to describe the specifies of the ingress operator and the alternatives in a form which can be easily reviewed (GitHub PR).
Acceptance criteria
- EP is approved and merged
Links
- Slack thread which discusses the need of the EP due to the complexity of the task.
- blocks
-
NE-1303 Add new capability for the ingress operator to OpenShift API
-
- Closed
-