Uploaded image for project: 'Multiple Architecture Enablement'
  1. Multiple Architecture Enablement
  2. MULTIARCH-3410

Feature Parity for Kubernetes SIG/RH Packaged - Scheduler Plugins

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Epic Epic
    • Resolution: Done
    • Icon: Normal Normal
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • Feature Parity for Scheduler Plugins
    • BU Product Work
    • False
    • None
    • False
    • Not Selected
    • NEW
    • To Do
    • OCPSTRAT-1473 - Feature Parity for Scheduler Plugins (IBM Power and IBM Z)
    • ppc64le, s390x, aarch64
    • OCPSTRAT-1473Feature Parity for Scheduler Plugins (IBM Power and IBM Z)
    • NEW
    • 20% To Do, 20% In Progress, 60% Done

      Epic Goal

      • Feature Parity for Kubernetes SIG/RH Packaged - Scheduler Plugins
      • Enable Power and s390x builds for Scheduler Plugins

      Why is this important?

      • Scheduling is a key component of workload management. Plugins enable customer specific/use case specific decisions to be made when scheduling the workload. e.g., to the closest NUMA node, the proper architecture, and many other decisions

       

      Scenarios
      1. As an OpenShift user, I want to schedule work based on plugins, and know it works on Power. https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/scheduler-plugins#plugins

      ... I have obviated the plugin scenarios, as each needs to be evaluated for official support.

       

      Acceptance Criteria

      • There is an SIG container build that runs in MU supported architectures on OpenShift.
      • The plugins load into the OpenShift Container Platform and can be used for decision making when scheduling workloads.

       

      Dependencies (internal and external)
      1. https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/scheduler-plugins

      2. This work should be done in parallel with Secondary Scheduler Operator

       

      Previous Work (Optional)
      1. Previous work was done in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MULTIARCH-2886

      The output is https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1nv1KwQhcOfX7fy6No9zbIfLFL0iK94xC?usp=sharing

       

      Open questions
      1. Should we tack on another plugin to the RH Teleco Team's build?

      2. Should we enable upstream with ppc64le / s390x?

      3. Should we verify each architecture for each plugin?

       

      Done Checklist

      • CI - For new features (non-enablement), existing Multi-Arch CI jobs are not broken by the Epic
      • Release Enablement: <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
      • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR orf GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - If the Epic is adding a new stream, downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
      • QE - Test plans in Test Plan tracking software (e.g. Polarion, RQM, etc.): <link or reference to the Test Plan>
      • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
      • QE - QE to verify documentation when testing
      • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
      • All the stories, tasks, sub-tasks and bugs that belong to this epic need to have been completed and indicated by a status of 'Done'.

              pbastide_rh Paul Bastide
              pbastide_rh Paul Bastide
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - Not Specified
                  Not Specified
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0 minutes
                  0m
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 3 days
                  3d