-
Epic
-
Resolution: Done
-
Normal
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
Feature Parity for Scheduler Plugins
-
BU Product Work
-
False
-
None
-
False
-
Not Selected
-
NEW
-
To Do
-
OCPSTRAT-1473 - Feature Parity for Scheduler Plugins (IBM Power and IBM Z)
-
ppc64le, s390x, aarch64
-
OCPSTRAT-1473Feature Parity for Scheduler Plugins (IBM Power and IBM Z)
-
NEW
-
20% To Do, 20% In Progress, 60% Done
Epic Goal
- Feature Parity for Kubernetes SIG/RH Packaged - Scheduler Plugins
- Enable Power and s390x builds for Scheduler Plugins
Why is this important?
- Scheduling is a key component of workload management. Plugins enable customer specific/use case specific decisions to be made when scheduling the workload. e.g., to the closest NUMA node, the proper architecture, and many other decisions
Scenarios
1. As an OpenShift user, I want to schedule work based on plugins, and know it works on Power. https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/scheduler-plugins#plugins
... I have obviated the plugin scenarios, as each needs to be evaluated for official support.
Acceptance Criteria
- There is an SIG container build that runs in MU supported architectures on OpenShift.
- The plugins load into the OpenShift Container Platform and can be used for decision making when scheduling workloads.
Dependencies (internal and external)
1. https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/scheduler-plugins
2. This work should be done in parallel with Secondary Scheduler Operator
Previous Work (Optional)
1. Previous work was done in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MULTIARCH-2886
The output is https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1nv1KwQhcOfX7fy6No9zbIfLFL0iK94xC?usp=sharing
Open questions
1. Should we tack on another plugin to the RH Teleco Team's build?
2. Should we enable upstream with ppc64le / s390x?
3. Should we verify each architecture for each plugin?
Done Checklist
- CI - For new features (non-enablement), existing Multi-Arch CI jobs are not broken by the Epic
- Release Enablement: <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
- DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR orf GitHub Issue>
- DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
- DEV - If the Epic is adding a new stream, downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
- QE - Test plans in Test Plan tracking software (e.g. Polarion, RQM, etc.): <link or reference to the Test Plan>
- QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
- QE - QE to verify documentation when testing
- DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
- All the stories, tasks, sub-tasks and bugs that belong to this epic need to have been completed and indicated by a status of 'Done'.