Major Description of problem:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 6.1
How reproducible: Seems to depend on the default storageclass provisioner and even then not very consistent
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Provision on GCP and set the standard storageClass as default.
2. Install MTA
3. Some PVCs may not provision
Actual results:
$ oc describe pvc mta-hub-bucket-volume-claim
Name: mta-hub-bucket-volume-claim
Namespace: openshift-mta
StorageClass:
Status: Pending
Volume:
Labels: app.kubernetes.io/component=hub
app.kubernetes.io/name=mta-hub
app.kubernetes.io/part-of=mta
volume=mta-hub-bucket
Annotations: <none>
Finalizers: [kubernetes.io/pvc-protection]
Capacity:
Access Modes:
VolumeMode: Filesystem
Used By: mta-hub-96dc6ff9d-cbn5k
Events:
Type Reason Age From Message
---- ------ ---- ---- -------
Normal FailedBinding 12s (x17 over 4m3s) persistentvolume-controller no persistent volumes available for this claim and no storage class is set
Expected results:
storage provisions as expected.
Tested and resolved with https://github.com/konveyor/tackle2-operator/pull/164
Additional info:
