Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Logging'
  1. OpenShift Logging
  2. LOG-5062

Only spec.collection is allowed when using multiple instances of ClusterLogForwarder

XMLWordPrintable

    • False
    • None
    • False
    • NEW
    • NEW
    • Hide
      Before this update, the validation feature for ClusterLogging not alignment with the current documentation.
      With this update, the validation feature for ClusterLogging aligned with documentation. Now, during validation, the system checks if a ClusterLogForwarder with the same name exists in the same namespace, otherwise an exception will be thrown.
      Show
      Before this update, the validation feature for ClusterLogging not alignment with the current documentation. With this update, the validation feature for ClusterLogging aligned with documentation. Now, during validation, the system checks if a ClusterLogForwarder with the same name exists in the same namespace, otherwise an exception will be thrown.
    • Bug Fix
    • Medium
    • Hide

      1) Deploy a CR in openshift-logging namespace with a different name of "instance"

      2) After that, check the instance

      $ oc project openshift-logging
$ oc get clusterlogging $name -o yaml

      3) Check the Status->Conditions section:

        - lastTransitionTime: "2024-02-08T14:24:54Z"
    message: 'validation failed: Only spec.collection is allowed when using multiple
      instances of ClusterLogForwarder: openshift-logging/adri'
    reason: Invalid
    status: "False"
    type: Ready
      Show
      1) Deploy a CR in openshift-logging namespace with a different name of "instance" 2) After that, check the instance $ oc project openshift-logging $ oc get clusterlogging $name -o yaml 3) Check the Status->Conditions section:   - lastTransitionTime: "2024-02-08T14:24:54Z"     message: 'validation failed: Only spec.collection is allowed when using multiple       instances of ClusterLogForwarder: openshift-logging/adri'     reason: Invalid     status: "False"     type: Ready
    • Log Collection - Sprint 249, Log Collection - Sprint 250, Log Collection - Sprint 251, Log Collection - Sprint 252

      Description of problem:

      When a CustomResource is created in OpenShift-logging namespace using a different name from "instance", the following message appears in status-> conditions section:

      message: 'validation failed: Only spec.collection is allowed when using multiple instances of ClusterLogForwarder: openshift-logging/<CR name>'

      According to the official documentation that for legacy implementation:

      In legacy implementations, you can only use one log forwarder in your cluster. The ClusterLogForwarder resource in this mode must be named instance, and must be created in the openshift-logging namespace. The ClusterLogForwarder resource also requires a corresponding ClusterLogging resource named instance in the openshift-logging namespace.

      And for Multi Log Forwarder feature:

      You cannot create a ClusterLogForwarder resource named instance in the openshift-logging namespace, because this is reserved for a log forwarder that supports the legacy workflow using the Fluentd collector.
You cannot create a ClusterLogForwarder resource named collector in the openshift-logging namespace, because this is reserved for the collector.

      So, with these previous sentences, we can confirm that a different name of "instance" cannot be used for creating a Custom Resource in "openshift logging"namespace".

      Therefore the validation error shouldn´t be:

      message: 'validation failed: Only spec.collection is allowed when using multiple instances of ClusterLogForwarder: openshift-logging/<CR name>'

      It should be something like: "Only instance name can be defined for a CR when using legacy mode or when deploys a CR in "openshift-logging" .

       

      Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

      RHOL 5.8

      Actual results:

      Verification message does not correspond to the real error.

      Expected results:

       

      Verification message corresponds to the real error.

              vparfono Vitalii Parfonov
              acandelp Adrian Candel
              Qiaoling Tang Qiaoling Tang
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: