Details
-
Bug
-
Resolution: Done
-
Major
-
None
-
None
-
False
-
False
-
NEW
-
OBSDA-7 - Adopting Loki as an alternative to Elasticsearch to support more lightweight, easier to manage/operate storage scenarios
-
VERIFIED
-
Logging (LogExp) - Sprint 213
Description
Tested on OCP 4.9 and below Loki csv.
[kbharti@cube hack]$ oc get csv -n openshift-logging
NAME DISPLAY VERSION REPLACES PHASE
loki-operator.v0.0.1 Loki Operator 0.0.1 Succeeded
Steps to Deploy Loki Operator:
1) Build and push the container image [2] and then deploy the operator with:
make olm-deploy REGISTRY_ORG=$YOUR_QUAY_ORG VERSION=$VERSION
2) create a storage secret for the operator
./hack/deploy-example-secret.sh openshift-logging
3) create a LokiStack instance to get the various components of Loki up and running
oc create -f lokistack_gateway_ocp.yaml -n openshift-logging
Documentation: https://github.com/grafana/loki/blob/main/operator/docs/hack_loki_operator.md#hacking-on-loki-operator-on-openshift
Result:
[kbharti@cube hack]$ oc get pods -n openshift-logging
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
ca62d525248e797cf94ed1f067021020d655a54cf961251d1ec098--1-stzct 0/1 Completed 0 10m
loki-compactor-lokistack-dev-0 0/1 CrashLoopBackOff 5 (2m17s ago) 5m28s
loki-distributor-lokistack-dev-764f88d94b-6hfnj 0/1 CrashLoopBackOff 5 (2m21s ago) 5m28s
loki-index-gateway-lokistack-dev-0 0/1 CrashLoopBackOff 5 (2m12s ago) 5m28s
loki-ingester-lokistack-dev-0 0/1 CrashLoopBackOff 5 (2m16s ago) 5m28s
loki-operator-controller-manager-79bb668fcf-xsd2m 2/2 Running 0 9m57s
loki-querier-lokistack-dev-6989b6964c-26vjf 0/1 CrashLoopBackOff 5 (2m27s ago) 5m28s
loki-query-frontend-lokistack-dev-5744d7f997-b27cs 0/1 CrashLoopBackOff 5 (2m18s ago) 5m28s
lokistack-gateway-lokistack-dev-7f69ccd568-rs5bh 2/2 Running 0 5m27s
quay-io-rhn-support-kbharti-loki-operator-bundle-v0-0-1 1/1 Running 0 10m
Error in LokiStack Pods: level=error ts=2022-01-10T16:54:10.516711991Z caller=main.go:51 msg="validating config" err="invalid queryrange config: querier.cache-results may only be enabled in conjunction with querier.split-queries-by-interval. Please set the latter"