Uploaded image for project: 'Kogito'
  1. Kogito
  2. KOGITO-4741

Consider "PodDisruptionBudget" and Anti-Affinity for KogitoRuntime placement

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Feature Request Feature Request
    • Resolution: Won't Do
    • Icon: Major Major
    • None
    • None
    • Operator
    • False
    • False
    • Undefined

      When running as a Managed Service, we should expect Nodes in our Kubernetes cluster to be ephemeral. It is likely the the Kubernetes cluster will be scaled up/down aggressively to keep running costs at a minimum.

      We need to ensure that the end user experience is not impacted by our need to keep on-top of running costs. If a Node is drained and removed from the Cluster, this should not be visible to the end user.

      In particular, when scheduling a KogitoRuntime, I can foresee requirements such:

      • Ensure that there are always at-least % of replicas running for a KogitoRuntime in the event of Cluster Administrator actions e.g. drain a node
      • Do not schedule all of a customers KogitoRuntimes onto the same node (if we can avoid it). This would be a "soft" scheduling requirement
      • Do not schedule all replicas for a KogitoRuntime onto the same node (if we can avoid it). This would be a "soft" scheduling requirement.

      There may be other requirements. This feature request is for us to consider how best to expose this ability and where the functionality should reside.

       

              vajain Vaibhav Jain
              rblake@redhat.com Rob Blake
              Karel Suta Karel Suta
              Karel Suta Karel Suta
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: