The status we show when listing commit information comes from the build pipeline. Failures in related pipelines that were triggered with the build finishing aren't reflected until a user views the commit details page, or looks at the un-aggregated pipeline runs elsewhere.

Can status better reflect the chain of events triggered by a commit? If not, can we make it more clear which status is summarized there?

https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C04PZ7H0VA8/p1695829895516609