Uploaded image for project: 'JGroups'
  1. JGroups
  2. JGRP-876

ConcurrentModificationException during startup of JBoss AS 5.0.0.GA

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Done
    • Icon: Major Major
    • 2.6.8, 2.7
    • 2.6.7
    • None

      I encountered a rare ConcurrentModificationException while starting the all profile of JBoss AS 5.0.0.GA:

      10:34:45,077 ERROR [AbstractKernelController] Error installing to Start: name=HAPartition state=Create
      org.jgroups.ChannelException: connect() failed
      at org.jgroups.JChannel.connect(JChannel.java:374)
      at org.jboss.ha.framework.server.ClusterPartition$ChannelConnectTask.run(ClusterPartition.java:167)
      at org.jboss.util.threadpool.RunnableTaskWrapper.run(RunnableTaskWrapper.java:147)
      at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:650)
      at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:675)
      at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
      Caused by: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
      at java.util.AbstractList$Itr.checkForComodification(AbstractList.java:449)
      at java.util.AbstractList$Itr.next(AbstractList.java:420)
      at java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableCollection$1.next(Collections.java:1010)
      at java.util.AbstractCollection.addAll(AbstractCollection.java:318)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.TP.handleDownEvent(TP.java:1575)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.TP.down(TP.java:1148)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.TP$ProtocolAdapter.down(TP.java:2308)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.Discovery.down(Discovery.java:354)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.MERGE2.down(MERGE2.java:153)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK.down(FD_SOCK.java:370)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.FD.down(FD.java:294)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.VERIFY_SUSPECT.down(VERIFY_SUSPECT.java:95)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.NAKACK.down(NAKACK.java:672)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST.down(UNICAST.java:462)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.STABLE.down(STABLE.java:299)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS.installView(GMS.java:545)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS.installView(GMS.java:453)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.ClientGmsImpl.becomeSingletonMember(ClientGmsImpl.java:356)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.ClientGmsImpl.join(ClientGmsImpl.java:86)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.ClientGmsImpl.join(ClientGmsImpl.java:39)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS.down(GMS.java:832)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.FC.down(FC.java:430)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.FRAG2.down(FRAG2.java:158)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.STATE_TRANSFER.down(STATE_TRANSFER.java:200)
      at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.FLUSH.down(FLUSH.java:272)
      at org.jgroups.stack.ProtocolStack.down(ProtocolStack.java:475)
      at org.jgroups.JChannel.downcall(JChannel.java:1478)
      at org.jgroups.JChannel.connect(JChannel.java:370)

      Looking at the source, here are the problematic lines:

      1573: ProtocolAdapter ad=(ProtocolAdapter)prot;
      1574: List<Address> tmp=ad.getMembers();
      1575: members.addAll(tmp);

      Looking now at ProtocolAdapter.getMembers(), I see that it does this:
      public List<Address> getMembers() {
      return Collections.unmodifiableList(members);
      }

      While Collections.unmodifiableList(...) ensures that the caller of getMembers() cannot modify the list, it can still iterate over it (e.g. line 1575). The offending mutation code is probably in ProtocolAdapter.down(Event):

      case Event.VIEW_CHANGE:
      View view=(View)evt.getArg();
      Vector<Address> tmp=view.getMembers();
      members.clear();
      members.addAll(tmp);
      break;

      There are several ways fix this, including, but not limited to:

      • Make ProtocolAdapter.members volatile, and create a new member list on view change
      • Make ProcotolAdapter.members a CopyOnWriteArrayList

              rhn-engineering-bban Bela Ban
              pferraro@redhat.com Paul Ferraro
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: