The REST-AT implementation is using a user-defined record type RecordType.USER_DEF_FIRST0 but it should be using its own predefined type.
-
Michael Musgrove
-
Michael Musgrove
- Votes:
-
0 Vote for this issue
- Watchers:
-
2 Start watching this issue
- Created:
- Updated:
- Resolved:
- Estimated:
-
- 1h
- Remaining:
-
- 1h
- Logged:
-
- Not Specified