[JBTM-1466] The REST-AT implementation needs its own abstract record type - Red Hat Issue Tracker

XML

Word

Printable

Details

Type: Bug
Status: Closed (View Workflow)
Priority: Major
Resolution: Done
Affects Version/s: 5.0.0.M2
Fix Version/s: 5.0.0.M2
Component/s: REST
Labels:
None

Estimated Difficulty:
Low

Description

The REST-AT implementation is using a user-defined record type RecordType.USER_DEF_FIRST0 but it should be using its own predefined type.

Attachments

Activity

People

Assignee:: Michael Musgrove

Reporter:: Michael Musgrove

Votes:: 0 Vote for this issue

Watchers:: 2 Start watching this issue

Dates

Created:: 2013/02/13 5:22 AM

Updated:: 2013/10/14 7:55 AM

Resolved:: 2013/02/15 4:59 AM

Time Tracking

Estimated:

1h

Remaining:

1h

Logged:

Not Specified