Uploaded image for project: 'jBPM'
  1. jBPM
  2. JBPM-10037

Transaction timeout reported even if RecordsPerTransaction param is used in LogCleanupCommand

XMLWordPrintable

      Customer is trying to clear DB tables using LogCleanupCommand but its failing with transaction timeout:

       

      WARN  [com.arjuna.ats.arjuna] (Transaction Reaper) ARJUNA012117: TransactionReaper::check timeout for TX 0:ffff64401459:1e9992f0:61f8f765:1267628 in state  RUN
      WARN  [com.arjuna.ats.arjuna] (Transaction Reaper Worker 1) ARJUNA012095: Abort of action id 0:ffff64401459:1e9992f0:61f8f765:1267628 invoked while multiple threads active within it.
      WARN  [com.arjuna.ats.arjuna] (Transaction Reaper Worker 1) ARJUNA012381: Action id 0:ffff64401459:1e9992f0:61f8f765:1267628 completed with multiple threads - thread EE-ManagedThreadFactory-default-Thread-1 was in progress with java.base@11.0.12/java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method)
      java.base@11.0.12/java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead(SocketInputStream.java:115)
      java.base@11.0.12/java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:168)
      . .. . 

       

      Customer is facing this issue while removing records from process audit table, here is the number of entries in process audit table:

       

      rhpam=# select count(*) from rhpam.nodeinstancelog;
        count   
      ----------
       46737161
      (1 row)
      rhpam=# select count(*) from rhpam.variableinstancelog;
        count   
      ----------
       23320841
      (1 row)
      rhpam=# select count(*) from rhpam.processinstancelog;
        count  
      ----------
       1406879
      (1 row)
      

       

      Customer tried using 'RecordsPerTransaction=100' but still its failing with transaction timeout. Seems RecordsPerTransaction param is not working as expected.

              ftirados Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
              ftirados Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
              Antonio Fernandez Alhambra Antonio Fernandez Alhambra (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: