Uploaded image for project: 'JBoss Enterprise Application Platform'
  1. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
  2. JBEAP-23240

[GSS](7.4.z) JBERET-537 - Error closing ItemReader.: javax.transaction.TransactionalException: ARJUNA016110: Transaction is required for invocation

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Done
    • Major
    • 7.4.5.CR1, 7.4.5.GA
    • None
    • Batch
    • None

    Description

      When job fails and jberet calls close() method on ItemReader interface this exception is thrown:

       [org.jberet] (Batch Thread - 1) Error closing ItemReader.: javax.transaction.TransactionalException: ARJUNA016110: Transaction is required for invocation

      Looking at the code it looks like the ChunkRunner code calls rollback() first and then safeClose which in turn calls close() method on ItemReader. If I understand correctly close() method must be called within transactional scope so the above behaviour breaks the spec. I've attached a test case provided by the customer to this JIRA.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          incorporates

          Bug - A problem that impairs or prevents the functions of the product. JBERET-537 Error closing ItemReader.: javax.transaction.TransactionalException: ARJUNA016110: Transaction is required for invocation

          • Major - To be worked after higher priority work items are addressed. When the severity is high and the effort to change it is low to moderate, this term is chosen. Issues in this category likely have an existing workaround but implementation or execution may be non-trivial.
          • Resolved
          is incorporated by

          Component Upgrade - A task tracking an update to a bundled component or revision of component upstream of the project. JBEAP-23241 [GSS](7.4.z) Upgrade jberet from 1.3.9 to 1.3.9.SP1

          • Major - To be worked after higher priority work items are addressed. When the severity is high and the effort to change it is low to moderate, this term is chosen. Issues in this category likely have an existing workaround but implementation or execution may be non-trivial.
          • Closed

          Activity

            People

              mstefank Martin Stefanko
              rhn-support-bmaxwell Brad Maxwell
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: