Uploaded image for project: 'Red Hat CodeReady Studio (devstudio)'
  1. Red Hat CodeReady Studio (devstudio)
  2. JBDS-3707

Installer - All-in-one installer creates situation where Browsersim fails

XMLWordPrintable

    • NEW

      Related to: JBDS-3676

      If a user performs an install with the all-in-one installer, the JDK installed will not permit Browsersim to be used.

            [JBDS-3707] Installer - All-in-one installer creates situation where Browsersim fails

            Jan Richter added a comment -

            Closing as done.

            Jan Richter added a comment - Closing as done.

            Alexey Kazakov added a comment -

            Documentation part is done. There is nothing we can do more. Resolving.

            Alexey Kazakov added a comment - Documentation part is done. There is nothing we can do more. Resolving.

            Misha Ali (Inactive) added a comment -

            Thanks, alexeykazakov. Logged a toolsdoc issue to track this requirement here: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TOOLSDOC-715

            Misha Ali (Inactive) added a comment - Thanks, alexeykazakov . Logged a toolsdoc issue to track this requirement here: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TOOLSDOC-715

            Alexey Kazakov added a comment -

            It should be documented as an issue. We don't have any particular plans to fix it.
            The problem is that OpenJDK is not supported by Browsim. Oracle Java should be used instead. This requirement is in our Browsersim FAQ - http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/faq/browsersim.html#general-browsersim

            Alexey Kazakov added a comment - It should be documented as an issue. We don't have any particular plans to fix it. The problem is that OpenJDK is not supported by Browsim. Oracle Java should be used instead. This requirement is in our Browsersim FAQ - http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/faq/browsersim.html#general-browsersim

            Misha Ali (Inactive) added a comment -

            Thanks, Len. This sounds like something that should be fixed for release rather than requiring documentation. Can you comment on whether it will be fixed or should be documented as an issue, nickboldt@gmail.com?

            Misha Ali (Inactive) added a comment - Thanks, Len. This sounds like something that should be fixed for release rather than requiring documentation. Can you comment on whether it will be fixed or should be documented as an issue, nickboldt@gmail.com ?

            Len DiMaggio added a comment -

            The problem is: JBDS-3676

            Len DiMaggio added a comment - The problem is: JBDS-3676

            Nick Boldt added a comment -

            Can you provide more details? How does it prevent it? Is this related to JBDS-3695 ?

            Nick Boldt added a comment - Can you provide more details? How does it prevent it? Is this related to JBDS-3695 ?

            Len DiMaggio added a comment -

            mhusnain

            Len DiMaggio added a comment - mhusnain

              alexeykazakov Alexey Kazakov
              ldimaggi@redhat.com Len DiMaggio
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: