Uploaded image for project: 'Red Hat CodeReady Studio (devstudio)'
  1. Red Hat CodeReady Studio (devstudio)
  2. JBDS-1381

Should EAP 5.0 be listed as EAP 5.x or do we need more versions ?

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Feature Request Feature Request
    • Resolution: Done
    • Icon: Blocker Blocker
    • 4.0.0.Beta2
    • None
    • server
    • None

      Now that EAP 5.1, EPP 5.1 and SOA-P 5.1 is coming out should we label our driver EAP 5.x instead of EAP 5.0 ?

      Will it work ?

      Or should we create a new set of servers ?

      Is there any differences we need to cater for ? diferent startup options etc. ?

        1. JBDS-1381.txt
          6 kB
        2. JBDS-1381.txt
          6 kB

              rob.stryker Rob Stryker (Inactive)
              manderse@redhat.com Max Andersen
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              0 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: