Update release notes for service pack 2 & 3

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 12:58 AM, Betty Prioux <bprioux@redhat.com> wrote:

Hi, Tyler.
I scanned through the JBCS RN you delivered in December:
https://access.redhat.com/jbossnetwork/restricted/softwareDetail.html?softwareId=55441&product=core.service.apachehttp&version=2.4.23&downloadType=securityPatches

I noticed 4 things that may need correction – you will know better than I if they're wrong or not.

1.
Should "2.4.24" under "Software Description" be "2.4.23"? I see 2.4.23 elsewhere, not 2.4.24.

Tyler: This was set by the portal deployment team, but yes it does need correction

2.
Should the word "here", in the screenshot below under installation details of part of the RN, be a link to a download page?

Tyler: "here" is a reference to the current page, the download link it higher up (this was existing text from the last release notes), it should be revised in future release notes "from here" to "using the download link above" or something like that.

3.
The text in the above screenshot seems unclear to me in these ways:

• Why does it say to download the "JBoss Web Server 2.4.23.zip" if this RN is for JBCS? Or must the user first download/extract a new JWS, then download/extract the new JBCS on top of that?

Tyler: looks like it was incorrect in the previous release notes and I missed it, I should get this fixed up.

• If "the appropriate 2.4.23 SP3 zip" refers to the JBCS zip, add "JBCS" after "appropriate" to make the JBCS part obvious. I find the 2 instances of "2.4.23" in the sentence confusing.

Tyler: Agreed

• Should there be a second download link to the JBCS download?

Tyler: It wasn't intended but yes.

4.
Should "JBoss Web Server" under "Detailed Description" (screenshot below) be changed to "JBCS" or "JBoss Core Services"? JWS seems incorrect here.

Tyler: looks like it was incorrect in the previous release notes and I missed it, I should get this fixed up.

If yes, also scan through the RN for the name "JBoss Web Server" to check if other instances should change to a JBCS name variant.

I didn't open a JBCS bug for these because it was quicker for me to dump the info & screenshots into email.
Feel free to move these into a bug, or to tell me to open a JIRA for you to take care of them.

Thanks!
Betty