Uploaded image for project: 'Infinispan'
  1. Infinispan
  2. ISPN-5518

Introduce a separate thread pool for async cache operations

This issue belongs to an archived project. You can view it, but you can't modify it. Learn more

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Enhancement Enhancement
    • Resolution: Done
    • Icon: Major Major
    • 8.0.0.Alpha2
    • 7.2.2.Final, 8.0.0.Alpha1
    • Configuration, Core
    • None

      At the moment, it is very easy for an application to start a huge number of putAsync operations and fill the transport executor's thread pool, delaying internal work such as state transfer. Increasing the size of the transport executor's thread pool won't work, because that would in turn fill the remote commands and JGroups' OOB thread pools, with the same effect.

      If the cache async operations used a different thread pool, it would be possible to configure more remoteCommandsThreadPool threads than asyncOperationsThreadPool threads, avoiding this problem.

              dberinde@redhat.com Dan Berindei (Inactive)
              dberinde@redhat.com Dan Berindei (Inactive)
              Archiver:
              rhn-support-adongare Amol Dongare

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Archived: