Uploaded image for project: 'Infinispan'
  1. Infinispan
  2. ISPN-4778

PessimisticLockingInterceptor throws when handling remote clear command

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Won't Do
    • Icon: Major Major
    • None
    • 6.0.2.Final
    • None

      Using InfiniSpan as it's shipped with Jboss WildFly 8.1.0.Final as distributed cache for Hibernate, it appears that the ClearCommand does not work in a cluster when pessimistic locking is used. Pessimistic locking seems to be the default in WildFly, even when theoretically it shouldn't be.

      This will result in the following exception:

      java.lang.ClassCastException: org.infinispan.context.impl.NonTxInvocationContext cannot be cast to org.infinispan.context.impl.TxInvocationContext
      	at org.infinispan.interceptors.locking.PessimisticLockingInterceptor.visitClearCommand(PessimisticLockingInterceptor.java:194)
      	at org.infinispan.commands.write.ClearCommand.acceptVisitor(ClearCommand.java:38)
      	at org.infinispan.interceptors.base.CommandInterceptor.invokeNextInterceptor(CommandInterceptor.java:98)
      	at org.infinispan.interceptors.base.CommandInterceptor.handleDefault(CommandInterceptor.java:112)
      	at org.infinispan.commands.AbstractVisitor.visitClearCommand(AbstractVisitor.java:47)
      	at org.infinispan.commands.write.ClearCommand.acceptVisitor(ClearCommand.java:38)
      	at org.infinispan.interceptors.base.CommandInterceptor.invokeNextInterceptor(CommandInterceptor.java:98)
      	at org.infinispan.interceptors.TxInterceptor.enlistWriteAndInvokeNext(TxInterceptor.java:255)
      	at org.infinispan.interceptors.TxInterceptor.visitClearCommand(TxInterceptor.java:206)
      	at org.infinispan.commands.write.ClearCommand.acceptVisitor(ClearCommand.java:38)
      	at org.infinispan.interceptors.base.CommandInterceptor.invokeNextInterceptor(CommandInterceptor.java:98)
      	at org.infinispan.interceptors.base.CommandInterceptor.handleDefault(CommandInterceptor.java:112)
      	at org.infinispan.commands.AbstractVisitor.visitClearCommand(AbstractVisitor.java:47)
      	at org.infinispan.commands.write.ClearCommand.acceptVisitor(ClearCommand.java:38)
      	at org.infinispan.interceptors.base.CommandInterceptor.invokeNextInterceptor(CommandInterceptor.java:98)
      	at org.infinispan.interceptors.InvocationContextInterceptor.handleAll(InvocationContextInterceptor.java:110)
      	at org.infinispan.interceptors.InvocationContextInterceptor.handleDefault(InvocationContextInterceptor.java:73)
      	at org.infinispan.commands.AbstractVisitor.visitClearCommand(AbstractVisitor.java:47)
      	at org.infinispan.commands.write.ClearCommand.acceptVisitor(ClearCommand.java:38)
      	at org.infinispan.interceptors.InterceptorChain.invoke(InterceptorChain.java:333)
      	at org.infinispan.commands.remote.BaseRpcInvokingCommand.processVisitableCommand(BaseRpcInvokingCommand.java:39)
      	at org.infinispan.commands.remote.SingleRpcCommand.perform(SingleRpcCommand.java:48)
      	at org.infinispan.remoting.InboundInvocationHandlerImpl.handleInternal(InboundInvocationHandlerImpl.java:95)
      	at org.infinispan.remoting.InboundInvocationHandlerImpl.access$000(InboundInvocationHandlerImpl.java:50)
      	at org.infinispan.remoting.InboundInvocationHandlerImpl$2.run(InboundInvocationHandlerImpl.java:172)
      	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
      	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
      

      The incoming command looks as follows:

      CacheRpcCommand cmd:
      
      command:
             ClearCommand{flags=null}
      
      icf:
             org.infinispan.context.TransactionalInvocationContextFactory@3ef1861e
      
      Interceptor chain: 	
              
              >> org.infinispan.interceptors.InvocationContextInterceptor -- checks if stopping, otherwise continues
      	>> org.infinispan.interceptors.CacheMgmtInterceptor         -- does nothing
      	>> org.infinispan.interceptors.TxInterceptor                -- checks "shouldEnlist", if false does nothing
      	>> org.infinispan.interceptors.NotificationInterceptor      -- does nothing
      	>> org.infinispan.interceptors.locking.PessimisticLockingInterceptor -- Throws exception if something in cache
      	>> org.infinispan.interceptors.EntryWrappingInterceptor
      	>> org.infinispan.interceptors.InvalidationInterceptor
      	>> org.infinispan.interceptors.CallInterceptor
      

      The problem seems to be that org.infinispan.commands.remote.BaseRpcInvokingCommand.processVisitableCommand always creates a NonTxInvocationContext. As per the following line of code:

      final InvocationContext ctx = icf.createRemoteInvocationContextForCommand(vc, getOrigin());
      

      When handling the ClearCommand, the PessimisticLockInterceptor always casts this to a TxInvocationContext whenever dataContainer is not empty, e.g. when there is cached data on the node where the clear command arrives. This happens in the following code:

         public Object visitClearCommand(InvocationContext ctx, ClearCommand command) throws Throwable {
            try {
               boolean skipLocking = hasSkipLocking(command);
               long lockTimeout = getLockAcquisitionTimeout(command, skipLocking);
               for (InternalCacheEntry entry : dataContainer.entrySet())
                  lockAndRegisterBackupLock((TxInvocationContext) ctx, entry.getKey(), lockTimeout, skipLocking);
               return invokeNextInterceptor(ctx, command);
            } catch (Throwable te) {
               releaseLocksOnFailureBeforePrepare(ctx);
               throw te;
            }
         }
      

      So seemingly this can't ever work.

      Either the PessimisticLockingInterceptor can't be in a the interceptor chain when handling commands from a remote destination, or something has to be done about about the InvocationContext when handling remote commands?

              pruivo@redhat.com Pedro Ruivo
              arjant_jira Arjan t (Inactive)
              Votes:
              1 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: