Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Hosted Control Plane'
  1. OpenShift Hosted Control Plane
  2. HOSTEDCP-1081

Ensure that using local storage for Etcd is a viable option for Agent and KubeVirt clusters

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Story
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Undefined
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • False
    • None
    • False
    • Hypershift Sprint 239, Hypershift Sprint 240, Hypershift Sprint 241, Hypershift Sprint 242, Hypershift Sprint 243, Hypershift Sprint 244, Hypershift Sprint 245, Hypershift Sprint 246, Hypershift Sprint 247, Hypershift Sprint 249, Hypershift Sprint 250, Hypershift Sprint 251, Hypershift Sprint 252
    • 0
    • 0
    • 0

    Description

      We need to validate that we are able to recover an hosted cluster's etcd (backed by storage such as LVM or HPP) when an underlying management cluster node disappears.

      In this scenario, we need to understand what happens when an etcd instance fails, and the underlying PVC is permanently gone. Will the etcd operator be able to detect this and recover? or will the etcd cluster in question remain in a degraded state indefinitely? Those are the types of questions that need answers which will help guide what the next steps are for supporting local storage for etcd.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            cewong@redhat.com Cesar Wong
            cewong@redhat.com Cesar Wong
            Liangquan Li Liangquan Li
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            12 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated: