Uploaded image for project: 'Hybrid Application Console'
  1. Hybrid Application Console
  2. HAC-2958

IBM Cloud shows as Technology Preview in console.redhat.com

This issue belongs to an archived project. You can view it, but you can't modify it. Learn more

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Icon: Critical Critical
    • None
    • None
    • Infrastructure

      The list of cloud providers in console.redhat.com where to deploy OpenShift is not accurate. We have declared IBM Cloud GA in 4.12 but the Hybrid Cloud console still shows this as TP

       

        1. ibmcloud-getting-started-incorrect-doclink.jpg
          ibmcloud-getting-started-incorrect-doclink.jpg
          459 kB
        2. Screenshot 2023-01-18 at 08.55.32.png
          Screenshot 2023-01-18 at 08.55.32.png
          6 kB

            [HAC-2958] IBM Cloud shows as Technology Preview in console.redhat.com

            Jeff Nowicki added a comment -

            dtaylor@redhat.com Thank you for followup/update. Can you please confirm that the 'Get Started' link issue is also addressed? I noted that in early comment and posted a screenshot of the incorrect doc link. Important that gets addressed asap as well to avoid any customer confusion.

            Jeff Nowicki added a comment - dtaylor@redhat.com Thank you for followup/update. Can you please confirm that the 'Get Started' link issue is also addressed? I noted that in early comment and posted a screenshot of the incorrect doc link. Important that gets addressed asap as well to avoid any customer confusion.

            David Taylor added a comment -

            dupe of HAC-2884

            David Taylor added a comment - dupe of HAC-2884

            Mike Turley added a comment -

            dtaylor@redhat.com mak.redhat.com it turns out this is a duplicate of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/HAC-2884 which was already addressed and merged in https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/service/uhc-portal/-/merge_requests/3831. It just missed this past release as it was merged yesterday and is still in QE review.

            Mike Turley added a comment - dtaylor@redhat.com mak.redhat.com it turns out this is a duplicate of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/HAC-2884 which was already addressed and merged in https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/service/uhc-portal/-/merge_requests/3831 . It just missed this past release as it was merged yesterday and is still in QE review.

            David Taylor added a comment -

            Hi, we moved this to the top of our backlog and we are having a sprint planning meeting tomorrow.  We should be able to get it assigned shortly.

            David Taylor added a comment - Hi, we moved this to the top of our backlog and we are having a sprint planning meeting tomorrow.  We should be able to get it assigned shortly.

            Marcos Entenza Garcia added a comment -

            dtaylor@redhat.com mikejturley is this something you could include in the current MRs you mentioned to get this change into production the sooner we can please? This will confuse customers who want to deploy OCP on IBM Cloud and may trigger not required support cases

             

            Marcos Entenza Garcia added a comment - dtaylor@redhat.com mikejturley is this something you could include in the current MRs you mentioned to get this change into production the sooner we can please? This will confuse customers who want to deploy OCP on IBM Cloud and may trigger not required support cases  

            Mike Turley added a comment -

            dtaylor@redhat.com this is unrelated to my MRs. I don't see any other MRs relating to this in the staged release notes either. Seems like something we weren't tracking

            Mike Turley added a comment - dtaylor@redhat.com this is unrelated to my MRs. I don't see any other MRs relating to this in the staged release notes either. Seems like something we weren't tracking

            David Taylor added a comment -

            Hi mikejturley, cc'ing you to see if this was addressed in the current MRs we are currently promoting to production.  -thanks

            David Taylor added a comment - Hi mikejturley , cc'ing you to see if this was addressed in the current MRs we are currently promoting to production.  -thanks

            Jeff Nowicki added a comment - - edited

            The `get started` link (see screenshot) is incorrectly pointing at 4.11 docs.

            Jeff Nowicki added a comment - - edited The `get started` link (see screenshot) is incorrectly pointing at 4.11 docs.

              mikejturley Mike Turley
              mak.redhat.com Marcos Entenza Garcia
              Archiver:
              rhn-support-sthamilt Stacey Hamilton

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Archived: