Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift GitOps'
  1. OpenShift GitOps
  2. GITOPS-8875

Image Updater: git process exhaustion when retrieving git access token

XMLWordPrintable

    • GitOps Tangerine Sprint 27, GitOps Tangerine Sprint 28

      Description of Problem

      error: cannot fork() for remote-https: Resource temporarily unavailable
      error: RPC failed; HTTP 500 curl 22 The requested URL returned error: 500\nfatal: expected flush after ref listing

      Observed inside the container there are 8,141 git processes, and further git commands fail with exit status 255 or 128. This appears to be either process/fork() exhaustion or leaking/unreaped git helper processes.

      Additional Info

      • <Any additional info such as logs, must-gather outputs, etc.>

      Problem Reproduction

      • <How do we reproduce the problem?>

      Reproducibility

      • <Always/Intermittent/Only Once>

      Prerequisites/Environment

      • <OpenShift, managed service (e.g., ROSA, ARO), operators, layered product, and other software versions, build details>

      Steps to Reproduce

      • ...

      Expected Results

      • ...

      Actual Results

      • ...

      Problem Analysis

      • <Completed by engineering team as part of the triage/refinement process>

      Root Cause

      • <What is the root cause of the problem? Or, why is it not a bug?>

      Workaround (If Possible)

      • <Are there any workarounds we can provide to the customers?>

      Fix Approaches

      • <If we decide to fix this bug, how will we do it?>

      Acceptance Criteria

      • ...

      Definition of Done

      • Code Complete:
        • All code has been written, reviewed, and approved.
      • Tested:
        • Unit tests have been written and passed.
        • Ensure code coverage is not reduced with the changes.
        • Integration tests have been automated.
        • System tests have been conducted, and all critical bugs have been fixed.
        • Tested and merged on OpenShift either upstream or downstream on a local build.
      • Documentation:
        • User documentation or release notes have been written (if applicable).
      • Build:
        • Code has been successfully built and integrated into the main repository / project.
        • Midstream changes (if applicable) are done, reviewed, approved and merged.
      • Review:
        • Code has been peer-reviewed and meets coding standards.
        • All acceptance criteria defined in the user story have been met.
        • Tested by reviewer on OpenShift.
      • Deployment:
        • The feature has been deployed on OpenShift cluster for testing.

              cfang@redhat.com Cheng Fang
              cfang@redhat.com Cheng Fang
              Tangerine
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: