Description of Problem

see comments in image-updater PR https://github.com/argoproj-labs/argocd-image-updater/pull/793
We'll need to investigate

• ways to support multiple helm parameters per image for both argocd and git write-back methods.
• support it for helm image.spec, image.name, and image.tag parameters
• add unit tests to cover new use cases.

Additional Info

Problem Reproduction

• <How do we reproduce the problem?>

Reproducibility

• <Always/Intermittent/Only Once>

Prerequisites/Environment

Steps to Reproduce

• ...

Expected Results

Actual Results

• ...

Problem Analysis

• <Completed by engineering team as part of the triage/refinement process>

Root Cause

• <What is the root cause of the problem? Or, why is it not a bug?>

Workaround (If Possible)

• <Are there any workarounds we can provide to the customers?>

Fix Approaches

• <If we decide to fix this bug, how will we do it?>

Acceptance Criteria

• ...

Definition of Done

• Code Complete:
  • All code has been written, reviewed, and approved.
• Tested:
  • Unit tests have been written and passed.
  • Ensure code coverage is not reduced with the changes.
  • Integration tests have been automated.
  • System tests have been conducted, and all critical bugs have been fixed.
  • Tested and merged on OpenShift either upstream or downstream on a local build.
• Documentation:
  • User documentation or release notes have been written (if applicable).
• Build:
  • Code has been successfully built and integrated into the main repository / project.
  • Midstream changes (if applicable) are done, reviewed, approved and merged.
• Review:
  • Code has been peer-reviewed and meets coding standards.
  • All acceptance criteria defined in the user story have been met.
  • Tested by reviewer on OpenShift.
• Deployment:
  • The feature has been deployed on OpenShift cluster for testing.