ACCEPT_DEFAULTS should be more fine grained

01:19:24 PM) Pete Muir: also, the other one i wanted to ask about
(01:19:29 PM) Pete Muir: was the ACCEPT_DEFAULTS thing
(01:19:34 PM) Pete Muir: atm it's a little to coarse
(01:19:42 PM) Pete Muir: i want to accept quite a lot of defaults, but not all of them
(01:19:58 PM) Pete Muir: e.g. i want to accept default versions
(01:20:06 PM) Pete Muir: but perhaps not questions about scaffolding
(01:20:17 PM) Pete Muir: perhaps this needs to be an enum, not a true/false
(01:21:39 PM) Lincoln: possible to do but would require converting the accept default functionality to an enum or value based check
(01:22:24 PM) Pete Muir: consider it
(01:22:33 PM) Pete Muir: because atm running without accept defaults is painful
(01:22:41 PM) Pete Muir: but with it, you miss critical questions
(01:23:26 PM) Lincoln: most questions are engineered for safe use of <ENTER>
(01:23:30 PM) Lincoln: prompts
(01:23:35 PM) Pete Muir: yeah
(01:23:37 PM) Pete Muir: but some aren't