Uploaded image for project: 'Forge'
  1. Forge
  2. FORGE-859

ACCEPT_DEFAULTS should be more fine grained

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Enhancement Enhancement
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: Major Major
    • 3.x Future
    • 1.2.3.Final
    • UI - Shell, Usability
    • None

      01:19:24 PM) Pete Muir: also, the other one i wanted to ask about
      (01:19:29 PM) Pete Muir: was the ACCEPT_DEFAULTS thing
      (01:19:34 PM) Pete Muir: atm it's a little to coarse
      (01:19:42 PM) Pete Muir: i want to accept quite a lot of defaults, but not all of them
      (01:19:58 PM) Pete Muir: e.g. i want to accept default versions
      (01:20:06 PM) Pete Muir: but perhaps not questions about scaffolding
      (01:20:17 PM) Pete Muir: perhaps this needs to be an enum, not a true/false
      (01:21:39 PM) Lincoln: possible to do but would require converting the accept default functionality to an enum or value based check
      (01:22:24 PM) Pete Muir: consider it
      (01:22:33 PM) Pete Muir: because atm running without accept defaults is painful
      (01:22:41 PM) Pete Muir: but with it, you miss critical questions
      (01:23:26 PM) Lincoln: most questions are engineered for safe use of <ENTER>
      (01:23:30 PM) Lincoln: prompts
      (01:23:35 PM) Pete Muir: yeah
      (01:23:37 PM) Pete Muir: but some aren't

              Unassigned Unassigned
              lincolnthree Lincoln Baxter III (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: