-
Epic
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Major
-
None
-
None
-
ovn-northd incremental processing - handle logical switch creation/deletion
-
False
-
-
False
-
-
FDP-759 - Improve ovn-northd incremental processing for network topology changes.
-
rhel-10
-
rhel-net-ovn
-
67% To Do, 0% In Progress, 33% Done
-
ssg_networking
-
FDP 24.H, FDP 25.A, OVN FDP Sprint 6, OVN FDP Sprint 7, OVN FDP Sprint 8
-
5
This epic tracks all the effort needed to deliver the solution related to the feature request described below.
Currently northd incremental processing fails when logical switches are added/removed. The I-P node dependency is:
NB.Logical_Switch -> en_northd -> en_lflow
When a new switch is created/deleted the "en_northd" input handler for logical switches is called:
bool
northd_handle_ls_changes(struct ovsdb_idl_txn *ovnsb_idl_txn,
const struct northd_input *ni,
struct northd_data *nd)
{
const struct nbrec_logical_switch *changed_ls;
struct northd_tracked_data *trk_data = &nd->trk_data; NBREC_LOGICAL_SWITCH_TABLE_FOR_EACH_TRACKED (changed_ls,
ni->nbrec_logical_switch_table) {
if (nbrec_logical_switch_is_new(changed_ls) ||
nbrec_logical_switch_is_deleted(changed_ls)) {
goto fail;
}
...
fail:
destroy_northd_data_tracked_changes(nd);
return false;
}
which in turn causes "en_lflow" handler for en_northd data changes to fail:
bool
lflow_northd_handler(struct engine_node *node,
void *data)
{
struct northd_data *northd_data = engine_get_input_data("northd", node);
if (!northd_has_tracked_data(&northd_data->trk_data)) {
return false;
}
...
This triggers a full recompute of the "en_lflow" node which can be costly at scale.