Uploaded image for project: 'Fast Datapath Product'
  1. Fast Datapath Product
  2. FDP-633

[Fedora] Fix the License in the spec file

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Done-Errata
    • Icon: Normal Normal
    • FDP-24.G
    • None
    • ovn24.03
    • 1
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False
    • Hide

      Given the Fedora spec file for OVN uses outdated or incorrect license identifiers that do not conform to the SPDX format required by Fedora, leading to rpmlin and rpminspect failures, 

      When the spec file is updated to use the correct SPDX license identifiers as per Fedora's guidelines, 

      Then, the spec file should include the below license string:

      Apache-2.0 AND LGPL-2.1-only AND SISSL 

       

      Show
      Given the Fedora spec file for OVN uses outdated or incorrect license identifiers that do not conform to the SPDX format required by Fedora, leading to rpmlin and rpminspect failures,  When the spec file is updated to use the correct SPDX license identifiers as per Fedora's guidelines,  Then, the spec file should include the below license string: Apache-2.0 AND LGPL-2.1-only AND SISSL  
    • FDP 24.F

      Fedora is pushing for SPDX licensing at least in the spec file. We are currently failing rpmlin because of that (https://artifacts.dev.testing-farm.io/f2013fbf-08ff-46e5-a8a5-0146a0124d90/, https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-d61183f77f). We should set the proper SPDX identifier for license in the spec file

            nusiddiq@redhat.com Siddique Numan
            amusil@redhat.com Ales Musil
            Ying Xu Ying Xu
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: