Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Etcd'
  1. OpenShift Etcd
  2. ETCD-638

[GA] Selectable etcd database size

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Epic Epic
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: Major Major
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • [GA] Selectable etcd database size
    • BU Product Work
    • False
    • None
    • False
    • Not Selected
    • To Do
    • OCPSTRAT-1283 - [GA] Selectable etcd database size
    • OCPSTRAT-1283[GA] Selectable etcd database size
    • 100% To Do, 0% In Progress, 0% Done

      Epic Goal*

      Follow up to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ETCD-513 where we delivered the tech-preview of the feature to configure the etcd DB size limit.
      This epic targets the GA of that feature and API. 

       
      Why is this important? (mandatory)

      Due to historical reasons, the etcd operator uses a static definition of an 8GB limit. Nowadays, customers with dense cluster configurations regularly reach the limit. OpenShift should provide a mechanism for increasing the database size while maintaining a validated configuration.

      The 8GB limit was due to historical limitations of the bbolt store which have been improved upon for a while and there are examples and discussion upstream to suggest that the quota limit can be set higher.

      See:

       
      Scenarios (mandatory) 

      Provide details for user scenarios including actions to be performed, platform specifications, and user personas.  

      1. As an admin I can increase the etcd database size via the openshift etcd API

       
      Dependencies (internal and external) (mandatory)

      We need to validate the effect of the increased DB size on API server availability and performance.
      See the GA criteria dependencies from the enhancement:
      https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/etcd/etcd-size-tuning.md#tech-preview—ga

      Contributing Teams(and contacts) (mandatory) 

      Our expectation is that teams would modify the list below to fit the epic. Some epics may not need all the default groups but what is included here should accurately reflect who will be involved in delivering the epic.

      • Development - etcd team
      • Documentation - etcd docs
      • QE - 
      • PX - 
      • Others -

      Acceptance Criteria (optional)

      Provide some (testable) examples of how we will know if we have achieved the epic goal.  

      Drawbacks or Risk (optional)

      Reasons we should consider NOT doing this such as: limited audience for the feature, feature will be superseded by other work that is planned, resulting feature will introduce substantial administrative complexity or user confusion, etc.

      Done - Checklist (mandatory)

      The following points apply to all epics and are what the OpenShift team believes are the minimum set of criteria that epics should meet for us to consider them potentially shippable. We request that epic owners modify this list to reflect the work to be completed in order to produce something that is potentially shippable.

      • CI Testing -  Basic e2e automationTests are merged and completing successfully
      • Documentation - Content development is complete.
      • QE - Test scenarios are written and executed successfully.
      • Technical Enablement - Slides are complete (if requested by PLM)
      • Engineering Stories Merged
      • All associated work items with the Epic are closed
      • Epic status should be “Release Pending” 

            Unassigned Unassigned
            rhn-coreos-htariq Haseeb Tariq
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: