Uploaded image for project: 'AMQ Broker'
  1. AMQ Broker
  2. ENTMQBR-8586

Duplicate acceptor name is considered valid by the operator

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: Normal Normal
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False

      Creating two acceptors which share same name is considered Valid by operator and leads to this setup:

      1. Broker has Acceptor1 with port 5672
      2. Broker has Acceptor2 with port 5673
      3. Openshift has Route created which is assigned to either of two acceptors.

      It seems that route is usually assigned to first acceptor in list, than overriden to second acceptor in list, but sometimes it keeps being assigned to first acceptor in list instead.
      This might pose a bigger problem if two Acceptors have different protocols enabled.

        1. reproducer.yaml
          0.3 kB
          Mikhail Krutov

              Unassigned Unassigned
              mkrutov Mikhail Krutov (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: