-
Enhancement
-
Resolution: Done
-
Major
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
2020 Week 13-15 (from Mar 23)
-
5
-
NEW
-
NEW
DMN DT Analysis include `null` for gaps/overlaps calculation where possible.
Implemented with considering a `null` value on a given a dimension:
- not "filling" Gaps on the other dimensions
- not causing Overlaps on the other dimensions
For example, in a table such as:
Rule2 is not overlapping with Rule1, as they don't overlap on dimension/In1 not for a range not for a singularity value.
Rule2 is not "filling" any gaps either, as for Rule2 is not spanning for dimension/In1 in the range [-Inf, 0], it cannot be a candidate to fill any gaps where in dimension/In2 >=0
Therefore the overall analysis for this table still is:
Gaps: [ -Inf .. 0 ) ( 0 .. +Inf ] [ 0 .. 0 ] [ 0 .. +Inf ] ( 0 .. +Inf ] [ -Inf .. 0 )
- relates to
-
RHDM-1292 [DMN] Validation yields a confusing message when a null is used in a decision table cell
- Closed