Uploaded image for project: 'Drools'
  1. Drools
  2. DROOLS-315

Support overloading of accumulate functions: Add int (or long) based sum's, int based avarage's, etc

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Feature Request Feature Request
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Icon: Critical Critical
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

      Using a sum(Number) accumulate of these 2 numbers: new BigDecimal("0.01") and new BigDecimal("0.09") give an incorrect result of 0.09999999999999999.
      Support sumBigDecimal(BigDecimal) or better yet sum(BigDecimal).

      Old description:

      TTP nl10 solver has about a 3% performance increase when switching from sumDouble to sumLong (and possibly a bit more when switching to sumInteger)
      There are 2 ways I see to implement this:
      
      1) Force the user to explicitly declare he wants to use an integer based sum and add a sumInteger.
      This is not so user-friendly. This is what I 've done in the patch.
      
      2) Support overloading of accumulate functions based on the function arguments.
      AFAIK drl is strongly typed (at least with the java dialect), so it should be theoretically possible for the drl parser to see
       sum($myInteger)
      and bind it to SumIntegerAccumulateFunction,
      while binding
       sum($myInteger.doubleValue())
      to SumDoubleAccumulateFunction.
      
      And added advantage is that the drl compiler will also mark some bugs as compiler errors. For example
        sum($myString)
      

              Unassigned Unassigned
              gdesmet@redhat.com Geoffrey De Smet (Inactive)
              Votes:
              9 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: