-
Bug
-
Resolution: Done
-
Major
-
2.3.0.Final
-
None
-
False
-
None
-
False
In order to make your issue reports as actionable as possible, please provide the following information, depending on the issue type.
Bug report
For bug reports, provide this information, please:
What Debezium connector do you use and what version?
debezium-postgres-connector - v1.6.2.Final
What is the connector configuration?
N/A
What is the captured database version and mode of depoyment?
(E.g. on-premises, with a specific cloud provider, etc.)
N/A
What behaviour do you expect?
Expected no change in schema names of Envelop, Key and Value records.
Default behavior :
Envelope - <prefix>.<schema>.<table>
Key - <prefix>.<schema>.<table>.Key
Value - <prefix>.<schema>.<table>.Value
Topic Name - <prefix>.<schema>.<table>
where <prefix> is from the database.server.name and topic.prefix in 1.6.2 and 2.x respectively{{ }}
Schema names incase of custom topic naming selector:
Topic Name - <custom-topic-name>
Envelope - <prefix>.<schema>.<table>
Key - <prefix>.<schema>.<table>.Key
Value - <prefix>.<schema>.<table>.Value
The above schema names must be same in 2.x with custom naming strategy as well. Schema prefix in 1.9.7 (same as in 1.6.2) is https://github.com/debezium/debezium/blob/v1.9.7.Final/debezium-core/src/main/java/io/debezium/relational/TableSchemaBuilder.java#L132
What behaviour do you see?
Schema names incase of custom topic naming strategy in DBZ 2.x:
Topic Name - <custom-topic-name>
Envelope - <custom-topic-name>
Key - <custom-topic-name>.Key
Value - <custom-topic-name>.Value
because TopicNamingStrategy#dataChangeTopic returns topic name.
Schema prefix in 2.X is https://github.com/debezium/debezium/blob/main/debezium-core/src/main/java/io/debezium/relational/TableSchemaBuilder.java#L125
{{}}
Do you see the same behaviour using the latest relesead Debezium version?
(Ideally, also verify with latest Alpha/Beta/CR version)
Yes
Do you have the connector logs, ideally from start till finish?
(You might be asked later to provide DEBUG/TRACE level log)
N/A
How to reproduce the issue using our tutorial deployment?
N/A
Feature request or enhancement
For feature requests or enhancements, provide this information, please:
Which use case/requirement will be addressed by the proposed feature?
<Your answer>
Implementation ideas (optional)
This can be implemented by having separate method to determine the schema prefix.
public interface TopicNamingStrategy<I extends DataCollectionId> { // .. current methods default String recordSchemaPrefix(I id) { // to support current behavior return dataChangeTopic(id); } } public class TableSchemaBuilder { public TableSchema create(TopicNamingStrategy topicNamingStrategy, Table table, ColumnNameFilter filter, ColumnMappers mappers, KeyMapper keysMapper) { ... final String schemaNamePrefix = topicNamingStrategy.recordSchemaPrefix(tableId); final String envelopeSchemaPrefix = topicNamingStrategy.dataChangeTopic(tableId); final String envelopSchemaName = Envelope.schemaName(envelopeSchemaPrefix); ... } } public class CustomTopicNamingStrategy extends SchemaTopicNamingStrategy { private String topicName = null; public CustomTopicNamingStrategy(Properties props) { super(props); String topicName = props.getProperty(FieldConstants.CUSTOM_TOPIC_NAME); if (!Strings.isNullOrBlank(topicName)) { this.topicName = props.getProperty(FieldConstants.CUSTOM_TOPIC_NAME); } } @Override public String dataChangeTopic(DataCollectionId id) { if (this.topicName != null) { return topicName; } return super.dataChangeTopic(id); } public String recordSchemaPrefix(DataCollectionId id) { // return AbstractTopicNamingStrategy's dataChangeTopic implementation which returns <prefix>.<schema>.<table> return super.dataChangeTopic(id); } }
- links to
-
RHEA-2024:129636 Red Hat build of Debezium 2.5.4 release