-
Bug
-
Resolution: Done
-
Blocker
-
1.9.5.Final
-
None
-
False
-
None
-
False
In order to make your issue reports as actionable as possible, please provide the following information, depending on the issue type.
Bug report
For bug reports, provide this information, please:
What Debezium connector do you use and what version?
Oracle 1.9.5.Final-redhat-00001
What is the connector configuration?
database.dbname: BOSCS19
database.history.kafka.bootstrap.servers: pcl-tracking-cluster-kafka-bootstrap:9092
database.history.kafka.topic: schema-changes.cdc.debezium.tt2-event
database.hostname: t-ttnv-scan.rete.testposte
database.password: ${secrets:tt2-event/debezium-connector-tt2-event-db:password}
database.port: 1521
database.server.name: cdc.debezium.tt2-event
database.user: ${secrets:tt2-event/debezium-connector-tt2-event-db:username}
key.converter: org.apache.kafka.connect.json.JsonConverter
key.converter.schemas.enable: false
table.include.list: DB_TRACK_OWNER.TRACK_EVO_TRACES
value.converter: org.apache.kafka.connect.json.JsonConverter
value.converter.schemas.enable: false
What is the captured database version and mode of depoyment?
(E.g. on-premises, with a specific cloud provider, etc.)
<Your answer>
What behaviour do you expect?
<Your answer>
What behaviour do you see?
Multiple parsing errors io.debezium.text.ParsingException: DDL statement couldn't be parsed. Please open a Jira issue with the statement 'alter table PK_CNT_GIORNI_TIPI_INC split partition PMAX at (TO_DATE('1410202215','DDMMYYYYHH24')) INTO (PARTITION P2022101414, PARTITION PMAX);
Do you see the same behaviour using the latest relesead Debezium version?
(Ideally, also verify with latest Alpha/Beta/CR version)
<Your answer>
Do you have the connector logs, ideally from start till finish?
(You might be asked later to provide DEBUG/TRACE level log)
<Your answer>
How to reproduce the issue using our tutorial deployment?
<Your answer>
Feature request or enhancement
For feature requests or enhancements, provide this information, please:
Which use case/requirement will be addressed by the proposed feature?
<Your answer>
Implementation ideas (optional)
<Your answer>
