Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Core Networking'
  1. OpenShift Core Networking
  2. CORENET-658

Support for Ansible playbook for offline migration

XMLWordPrintable

    • Support for Ansible playbook for offline migration
    • Product / Portfolio Work
    • 7% To Do, 3% In Progress, 90% Done
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False
    • Green
    • Hide

       [May 08, 2025] Migration playbook updates to meet Ansible collections standards. PR expected to be submitted by mid of next week. Development PR for standardising the approach to be submitted by early next week. ETA to complete this epic to be determined by mid next week. Worst case ETA June 09, 2025.

       [April 10, 2025] Ansible validation workflow guide is expected to filled today. Performance degradation bug (OCPBUGS-54575) reported by Perf Team. Awaiting perf report between Manual migration vs Ansible based migration. 

       [April 03, 2025] Anisble team to get back on the process to publish playbooks to automation hub. Current ETA for docs, automation hub and performance testing  should be ready by May 15, 2025.

       [March 20, 2025] PR merged, functional testing done and CI in place. Documentation in progress. Performance team flagged a risk on their capacity for this Epic. Decision to be made today. 

      [March 10, 2025] The current priority for Miheer is to get the PR merged and refine any add-ons later. Doc work for this Epic has also been initiated.

      Show
        [May 08, 2025] Migration playbook updates to meet Ansible collections standards. PR expected to be submitted by mid of next week. Development PR for standardising the approach to be submitted by early next week. ETA to complete this epic to be determined by mid next week. Worst case ETA June 09, 2025.   [April 10, 2025] Ansible validation workflow guide is expected to filled today. Performance degradation bug ( OCPBUGS-54575 ) reported by Perf Team. Awaiting perf report between Manual migration vs Ansible based migration.    [April 03, 2025] Anisble team to get back on the process to publish playbooks to automation hub. Current ETA for docs, automation hub and performance testing  should be ready by May 15, 2025.   [March 20, 2025] PR merged, functional testing done and CI in place. Documentation in progress. Performance team flagged a risk on their capacity for this Epic. Decision to be made today.  [March 10, 2025] The current priority for Miheer is to get the PR merged and refine any add-ons later. Doc work for this Epic has also been initiated.
    • None
    • 0

      Template:

      Networking Definition of Planned

      Epic Template descriptions and documentation

      Epic Goal

      Support for Ansible playbook for offline migration

      Why is this important?

      Planning Done Checklist

      The following items must be completed on the Epic prior to moving the Epic from Planning to the ToDo status

      • Priority+ is set by engineering
      • Epic must be Linked to a +Parent Feature
      • Target version+ must be set
      • Assignee+ must be set
      • (Enhancement Proposal is Implementable
      • (No outstanding questions about major work breakdown
      • (Are all Stakeholders known? Have they all been notified about this item?
      • Does this epic affect SD? {}Have they been notified{+}? (View plan definition for current suggested assignee)
        1. Please use the “Discussion Needed: Service Delivery Architecture Overview” checkbox to facilitate the conversation with SD Architects. The SD architecture team monitors this checkbox which should then spur the conversation between SD and epic stakeholders. Once the conversation has occurred, uncheck the “Discussion Needed: Service Delivery Architecture Overview” checkbox and record the outcome of the discussion in the epic description here.
        2. The guidance here is that unless it is very clear that your epic doesn’t have any managed services impact, default to use the Discussion Needed checkbox to facilitate that conversation.

      Additional information on each of the above items can be found here: Networking Definition of Planned

      Acceptance Criteria

      • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
      • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement
        details and documents.

      ...

      Dependencies (internal and external)

      1.

      ...

      Previous Work (Optional):

      1. …

      Open questions::

      1. …

      Done Checklist

      • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
      • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
      • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
      • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
      • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
      • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

              rhn-support-misalunk Miheer Salunke
              ddharwar@redhat.com Deepthi Dharwar (Inactive)
              None
              None
              None
              Darragh Fitzmaurice Darragh Fitzmaurice
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              9 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: