-
Epic
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Undefined
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
[R&D spike] Design multi-cluster network connectivity between on-prem and cloud
-
To Do
-
Product / Portfolio Work
-
-
100% To Do, 0% In Progress, 0% Done
-
False
-
-
False
-
Not Selected
-
None
-
None
-
None
Template:
Networking Definition of Planned
Epic Template descriptions and documentation
Epic Goal
The goal of this epic is to figure out the road map for connecting hybrid OCP clusters together, from a networking perspective. We need to figure out the underlying technologies we need, and how each cloud provider can be supported. It is outside of the scope of this Epic to determine non-networking multi-cluster managment.
The design should be done in stages, so that we can release an MVP with key features and then build upon it later. The first target cloud will be AWS. The main goals will include:
- Stretching UDNs between clusters, especially layer 2, and being able to VM migrate between clusters.
- Ensuring generic technologies are used across multiple cloud platforms. For example IPSec, BGP, layer 2 overlay like vxlan or geneve.
Why is this important?
Many customers will have hybrid platforms where some are on prem while others are in cloud. They will desire the flexibility to connect networks between them and facilitate live migration of VMs from/to cloud.
Planning Done Checklist
The following items must be completed on the Epic prior to moving the Epic from Planning to the ToDo status
Priority+ is set by engineering
Epic must be Linked to a +Parent Feature
Target version+ must be set
Assignee+ must be set
(Enhancement Proposal is Implementable
(No outstanding questions about major work breakdown
(Are all Stakeholders known? Have they all been notified about this item?
Does this epic affect SD? {}Have they been notified{+}? (View plan definition for current suggested assignee)
- Please use the “Discussion Needed: Service Delivery Architecture Overview” checkbox to facilitate the conversation with SD Architects. The SD architecture team monitors this checkbox which should then spur the conversation between SD and epic stakeholders. Once the conversation has occurred, uncheck the “Discussion Needed: Service Delivery Architecture Overview” checkbox and record the outcome of the discussion in the epic description here.
- The guidance here is that unless it is very clear that your epic doesn’t have any managed services impact, default to use the Discussion Needed checkbox to facilitate that conversation.
Additional information on each of the above items can be found here: Networking Definition of Planned
Acceptance Criteria
- CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
- Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement
details and documents.
...
Dependencies (internal and external)
1.
...
Previous Work (Optional):
1. …
Open questions::
1. …
Done Checklist
- CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
- Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
- DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
- DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
- DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
- QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
- QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
- DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>