Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Virtualization'
  1. OpenShift Virtualization
  2. CNV-51656

Dynamic naming design proposal: Add future option for different target

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Task Task
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: Undefined Undefined
    • None
    • None
    • CNV Network
    • 1
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False
    • None
    • ---
    • ---
    • CNV Network Core 41
    • None

      Add to the design document [1] an enhancement option to support the possible pod interface naming change during migration.

      While we will not support this and will try to reject any attempt to do something like that, we still need a backup plan in case there will be no choice but to do support something like that (e.g. if UDN decides to drop this odd name and get back to the classic good old eth0).

      The suggested solution from Vladik was to add the data to the VMI status migration section, such that the VMI controller can take it into account.
      It is possible to add this in a future release because it is not dependent on the source VM. Its functionality is on the VMI controller and Migration controller.

       [1]https://github.com/kubevirt/community/blob/e65fc8a2c17f6c34579175cefd2657a0dbab4e26/design-proposals/dynamic-primary-pod-nic-name.md

       

              ehaas1@redhat.com Edward Haas
              omisan@redhat.com Orel Misan
              Nir Rozen Nir Rozen
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: