-
Bug
-
Resolution: Done-Errata
-
None
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2002313 +++
Description of problem:
I installed OpenShift Virtualization 4.8.1 and created different VMs with different specs. I used different numbers for cpu core field. However, Kubevirt doesn't change the requested cpu amount in virt-launcher spec. It was always 100m.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.8.1
Actual results:
All virt-launcher pods contains the same amount of cpu. 100m
Expected results: It should be proportional to VM spec as explained here: http://kubevirt.io/user-guide/operations/node_overcommit/#node-cpu-allocation-ratio
Additional info: HCO is not setting cpuAllocationRatio in Kubevirt and it is empty by default.
— Additional comment from Kedar Bidarkar on 2021-09-08 18:45:46 UTC —
Tried to reproduce this:
a) Explicitly set the "cpuAllocationRatio" value via the JSON Annotation Patch.
]$ oc annotate --overwrite -n openshift-cnv hyperconverged kubevirt-hyperconverged kubevirt.kubevirt.io/jsonpatch='[
{ "op": "add", "path": "/spec/configuration/developerConfiguration/cpuAllocationRatio", "value": 20 }]'
b) Value appears set correctly
]$ oc get kubevirt kubevirt-kubevirt-hyperconverged -n openshift-cnv -o yaml | grep -A 5 "configuration:"
configuration:
developerConfiguration:
cpuAllocationRatio: 20
diskVerification:
memoryLimit: 2G
featureGates:
c) I had set the "cores" count under "cpu" as 6
]$ oc get vmi vm22-rhel84-ocs -o yaml | grep -A 5 "cpu:"
cpu:
cores: 6
sockets: 1
threads: 1
—
d) virt-launcher pod shows "cpu: 100m"
]$ oc get pod virt-launcher-vm22-rhel84-ocs-sv46l -o yaml | grep "cpu:"
cpu: 100m
POD CPU request = number of vCPUs * 1/cpuAllocationRatio
Probably the expected value should have been 6/20 = 330m or 300m , IIUC
—
e)
Logged into the VM and checked for the nproc value. It is indeed 6.
[cloud-user@vm22-rhel84-ocs ~]$ nproc
6
— Additional comment from Kedar Bidarkar on 2021-09-08 18:47:41 UTC —
comment1 stuff was reproduced on CNV-4.9.0.
— Additional comment from Vladik Romanovsky on 2021-09-13 15:30:09 UTC —
I've posted https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/pull/6374 to fix this.