Uploaded image for project: 'CDI Specification Issues'
  1. CDI Specification Issues
  2. CDI-487

Clarify decorator beans relationship to EJB spec

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    Description

      In "8.1. Decorator beans" there are two following sentences:

      Decorators of a session bean must comply with the bean provider programming restrictions
      defined by the EJB specification. Decorators of a stateful session bean must comply with the rules
      for instance passivation and conversational state defined by the EJB specification.

      I guess the first sentence corresponds "somehow" to "4.9 The Responsibilities of the Bean Provider" in EJB spec. This EJB chapter (specifically 4.9.2) specifies e.g that session bean class must not be abstract.
      This seems to contradict bit with abstract decorator for session bean, which is legal in CDI. This restriction would be IMO unnecessary.
      I am also not sure about implications of the second sentence.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            tremes1@redhat.com Tomas Remes
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: