Uploaded image for project: 'CDI Specification Issues'
  1. CDI Specification Issues
  2. CDI-317

review PassivationCapable interface

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Obsolete
    • Icon: Major Major
    • TBD
    • None
    • Beans
    • None

      Currently the spec says that only passivation capable Beans must implement the PassivationCapable interface.

      But a Bean class could result in both passivation-capable and not-passivation-capable beans. For e.g. a ProducerMethodBean it depends on the scope of the produced instance. For implementing this properly you would need to always need 2 classes for each bean-type. And even worse - often you know only after the all the Bean-building that this very bean is passivation-capable or not.

      Thus I suggest to extend the meaning of PassivationCapable#getId() to allow returning null if the very bean doesn't support passivation.

              Unassigned Unassigned
              struberg Mark Struberg (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: