-
Story
-
Resolution: Duplicate
-
Normal
-
None
-
builds-1.0
-
False
-
None
-
False
-
-
Story (Required)
As a Red Hat engineer trying to verify the quality builds for OpenShift I want the upstream test suite to use Ginkgo spec labels so that I can isolate the core tests that truly matter.
<Describes high level purpose and goal for this story. Answers the questions: Who is impacted, what is it and why do we need it? How does it improve the customer’s experience?>
Background (Required)
<Describes the context or background related to this story>
Outcome from BUILD-794 spike - upstream build e2e suite is monolithic and includes features that we don't support in the product yet (ex: buildpacks and ko test samples)
See https://github.com/shipwright-io/build/issues/1451
Out of scope
<Defines what is not included in this story>
TBD
Approach (Required)
<Description of the general technical path on how to achieve the goal of the story. Include details like json schema, class definitions>
TBD
Dependencies
<Describes what this story depends on. Dependent Stories and EPICs should be linked to the story.>
TBD
Acceptance Criteria (Mandatory)
<Describe edge cases to consider when implementing the story and defining tests>
<Provides a required and minimum list of acceptance tests for this story. More is expected as the engineer implements this story>
TBD
INVEST Checklist
Dependencies identified
Blockers noted and expected delivery timelines set
Design is implementable
Acceptance criteria agreed upon
Story estimated
Legend
Unknown
Verified
Unsatisfied
Done Checklist
- Code is completed, reviewed, documented and checked in
- Unit and integration test automation have been delivered and running cleanly in continuous integration/staging/canary environment
- Continuous Delivery pipeline(s) is able to proceed with new code included
- Customer facing documentation, API docs etc. are produced/updated, reviewed and published
- Acceptance criteria are met