-
Feature Request
-
Resolution: Done
-
Major
-
1.0.0.Alpha2
-
None
A Contianer should be able to run with any of the support Protocols for communication with TestCase running inside the container. This needs to be configurable in a common way.
Currently Servlet Protocol configuration is stuck in the specific Containers who use it, this needs to be extracted.
e.g.
<arquillian xmlns="http://jboss.com/arquillian" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:jboss="urn:arq:org.jboss.arquillian.jbossas.remote60" xmlns:servlet="urn:arq:org.jboss.arquillian.protocol.servlet" xmlns:jmx="urn:arq:org.jboss.arquillian.protocol.jmx" xmlns:jndi="urn:arq:org.jboss.arquillian.jndi"> <jboss:container id="jbossTest"> <localDeploymentBindAddress>my.domain</localDeploymentBindAddress> <servlet:protocol> <remoteServerAddress>remote.server</remoteServerAddress> <remoteServerHttpPort>8181</remoteServerHttpPort> </servlet:protocol> <jndi:protocol> <!-- Is this really a Protocol in the Arquillian sense? --> <javaNamingProviderUrl>jnp://remote.server:1099</javaNamingProviderUrl> <javaNamingFactoryInitial>org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContextFactory</javaNamingFactoryInitial> <javaNamingFactoryUrlPkgs>org.jboss.naming\:org.jnp.interfaces</javaNamingFactoryUrlPkgs> </jndi:protocol> </jboss:container> <jboss:container id="jbossStage"> <localDeploymentBindAddress>my.domain</localDeploymentBindAddress> <jmx:protocol> <serviceUrl>service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/</serviceUrl> </jmx:protocol> <jndi:protocol> <javaNamingProviderUrl>jnp://remote.server:1099</javaNamingProviderUrl> <javaNamingFactoryInitial>org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContextFactory</javaNamingFactoryInitial> <javaNamingFactoryUrlPkgs>org.jboss.naming\:org.jnp.interfaces</javaNamingFactoryUrlPkgs> </jndi:protocol> </jboss:container> </arquillian>