Uploaded image for project: 'Service Binding'
  1. Service Binding
  2. APPSVC-982

Help opensource operators to become binding friendly

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Epic Epic
    • Resolution: Done
    • Icon: Undefined Undefined
    • None
    • None
    • Service Binding
    • Help opensource operators to become binding friendly
    • False
    • False
    • To Do
    • QE Needed, Docs Needed, TE Needed, Customer Facing
    • 0% To Do, 0% In Progress, 100% Done

      Problem:

      As our research in APPSVC-848 shows, none of open source operators are service binding compatible, and hence we needed to make them bindablle from SBO side, by watching for their CRDs and adding appropriate service binding annotations.

      Goal:

      Help operator developers to achieve service binding compatibility on their side, and drop the support on our side.

      Why is it important?

      This is going to expand the ecosystem and make their operator usable with another service binding implementation (e.g. the reference implementation)

      Acceptance criteria

      Our PRs are accepted and the operators are binding compatible.

      Dependencies (External/Internal)

      Design Artifacts

      Exploration

      Note

              Unassigned Unassigned
              pedjak@gmail.com Predrag Knezevic (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: