-
Story
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Critical
-
None
-
None
-
False
-
-
False
-
-
Context
Before building data pipelines or integrations, we need a concrete and shared understanding of what the unified GPU dashboard should look like and which questions it must answer.
A clear mock is required to align all stakeholders on:
what data is needed, how it is presented, and how it will actually be used for decision-making.
This story intentionally comes first, as it drives the data model, architecture, and integration requirements
Objective
Create a dashboard mock that defines the target end-state UX and explicitly documents all required data fields, filters, and views.
The mock will serve as the contract for:
data collection, normalization, and architecture decisions in subsequent stories.
Scope
In scope:
- Create a visual mock (low or mid fidelity is sufficient)
- Define all dashboard views and sections
- Define filters and drill-down dimensions
- Explicitly list all required data fields per view
- Define freshness expectations per data type (real-time vs near real-time)
Out of scope:
- Backend implementation
- Data ingestion pipelines
- Production dashboard setup
Dashboard Capabilities to Cover
The mock must clearly show how a user can:
- See total GPU inventory
- Filter by team, environment, cloud, and cluster
- Distinguish idle vs used GPUs
- See usage over time (patterns, not just current state)
- Associate GPUs or GPU pools with estimated cost
- Identify underutilization and inefficiencies
- Answer “who used which GPUs and when”
Deliverables
- Dashboard mock (image or doc, etc)
- Explicit list of required data fields per widget/view
- Defined filters and dimensions
- Notes on assumptions and open questions
DoD
This story is complete when:
- A mock exists and is reviewable
- Required data fields are clearly documented
- Stakeholders agree the mock answers real managerial questions
- The mock can be used to drive architecture and data requirements