Uploaded image for project: 'Agent-based Installer for OpenShift'
  1. Agent-based Installer for OpenShift
  2. AGENT-569

Platform none support

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Epic Epic
    • Resolution: Done
    • Icon: Critical Critical
    • openshift-4.14
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • Platform none support
    • BU Product Work
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False
    • Green
    • Done
    • OCPSTRAT-597 - UPI workflows with Agent-based Installer
    • 0% To Do, 0% In Progress, 100% Done
    • Hide

      23/July2023

      Status: Green

      Reached dev-complete.

      14/July/2023

      Status: Green

      PR to remove validation checks merged. Dev-scripts support and CI job PRs still under review.

      Moved tasks for creating mixed environment CI testing to future Epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AGENT-681

      7/July/2023

      Status: Green

      No change since last week. PRs still under review. CI job to test none platform will be started next sprint.

      30/June/2023

      Status: Green

      Posted PR to add support for none platform in dev-scripts. PR to unblock none platform for compact and HA clusters still under review.

      Todo:

      • CI job to test none platform in either compact or HA cluster configuration

      23/June/2023

      Status: Green

      Able to install an HA cluster using the PR to unblock none platform. Next week, will start adding support for none platform in dev-scripts which will enable us to test this epic in CI.

      12/June/2023

      Status: Green

      PR to unblock none platform for compact and HA clusters has been submitted and is under review.

      Show
      23/July2023 Status:  Green Reached dev-complete. 14/July/2023 Status:  Green PR to remove validation checks merged. Dev-scripts support and CI job PRs still under review. Moved tasks for creating mixed environment CI testing to future Epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AGENT-681 7/July/2023 Status:  Green No change since last week. PRs still under review. CI job to test none platform will be started next sprint. 30/June/2023 Status:  Green Posted PR to add support for none platform in dev-scripts. PR to unblock none platform for compact and HA clusters still under review. Todo: CI job to test none platform in either compact or HA cluster configuration 23/June/2023 Status:  Green Able to install an HA cluster using the PR to unblock none platform. Next week, will start adding support for none platform in dev-scripts which will enable us to test this epic in CI. 12/June/2023 Status:  Green PR to unblock none platform for compact and HA clusters has been submitted and is under review.

      Epic Goal

      Support deploying multi-node clusters using platform none.

      Why is this important?

      As of Jan 2023 we have almost 5,000 clusters reported using platform none installed on-prem (metal, vmware or other hypervisors with no platform integration) out of a total of about 12,000 reported clusters installed on-prem.

      Platform none is desired by users to be able to install clusters across different host platforms (e.g. mixing virtual and physical) where Kubernetes platform integration isn't a requirement. 

      A goal of the Agent-Based Installer is to help users who currently can only deploy their topologies with UPI to be able to use the agent-based installer and get a simpler user experience while keeping all their flexibility.

      Done Checklist

      • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
      • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
      • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
      • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
      • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
      • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

            [AGENT-569] Platform none support

            Richard Su added a comment -

            Tech Enablement slides and link to demo: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1KEkZQnS_-KuxvM_yWuZwVhGJPomlifwMLGKW2M41zyk/edit?usp=sharing

            Richard Su added a comment - Tech Enablement slides and link to demo: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1KEkZQnS_-KuxvM_yWuZwVhGJPomlifwMLGKW2M41zyk/edit?usp=sharing

            Jianwei Hou added a comment -

            Adding rhn-support-pamoedom as QA contact

            Jianwei Hou added a comment - Adding rhn-support-pamoedom as QA contact

            Mike Fiedler added a comment -

            rh-ee-zniu mustachee This is targeted for 4.14.  Can we assign QA and get the tasks created?

            Mike Fiedler added a comment - rh-ee-zniu mustachee This is targeted for 4.14.  Can we assign QA and get the tasks created?

            Zane Bitter added a comment -

            Andrea and I discussed this earlier and he is going to talk to the rest of the team with a view to getting someone assigned to it today.

            Zane Bitter added a comment - Andrea and I discussed this earlier and he is going to talk to the rest of the team with a view to getting someone assigned to it today.

            Ramon Acedo added a comment -

            beth.white, zabitter, afasano@redhat.com this epic isn't groomed yet and by now we should know if it can fit in 4.14 or we need to reset expectations.

            There are a few customers asking about it now and one request to backport it to 4.12, since it's our current EUS.

            See additional context in the parent epic too.

            Could you please review the options for including it in 4.14?

             

            Ramon Acedo added a comment - beth.white , zabitter , afasano@redhat.com this epic isn't groomed yet and by now we should know if it can fit in 4.14 or we need to reset expectations. There are a few customers asking about it now and one request to backport it to 4.12, since it's our current EUS. See additional context in the parent epic too. Could you please review the options for including it in 4.14?  

            Ramon Acedo added a comment -

            Added link to OSASINFRA-3069 since the work done there should allow for UPI-like installations / platform:none to have a load balancer and complete the cluster installation.

            Ramon Acedo added a comment - Added link to OSASINFRA-3069 since the work done there should allow for UPI-like installations / platform:none to have a load balancer and complete the cluster installation.

              rwsu1@redhat.com Richard Su
              racedoro@redhat.com Ramon Acedo
              Biagio Manzari Biagio Manzari
              Zane Bitter Zane Bitter
              Votes:
              4 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              19 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: