Uploaded image for project: 'AeroGear'
  1. AeroGear
  2. AEROGEAR-5307

AGStore remove:recorId instead of object

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Feature Request Feature Request
    • Resolution: Done
    • Icon: Major Major
    • 1.4.0
    • 1.2.0
    • None
    • None

      Should we remove but recorId ot by object?
      Ensure:
      https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios/commit/3147807833162a5a30faaf6e8f4fe4fa3a2a2455
      makes sense and fir with other AG libs.

      2013-11-26T10:15:10 <corinnekrych> writing documentation for SQL cookbook cvasilak I bumped into a question why do we have read:recordId and remove:record in the case of the remove we give the object whether in the read we give the id of the object cvasilak
      2013-11-26T10:15:30 <edewit> corinnekrych: cvasilak: found it you need to use lipo to merge the phone and simulator libs together
      2013-11-26T10:15:31 *** stianst <stianst!~smuxi@cpc11-gate10-2-0-cust496.16-2.cable.virginm.net> has joined #aerogear
      2013-11-26T10:15:32 <corinnekrych> besides checking android lib they use id in both method cvasilak
      2013-11-26T10:15:43 <corinnekrych> do you know why we've got this difference?
      2013-11-26T10:25:14 <cvasilak> corinnekrych: it was refactored a while ago by matzew to match the Pipe protocol where in there remove takes as an argument the object https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios/commit/3147807833162a5a30faaf6e8f4fe4fa3a2a2455
      2013-11-26T10:25:15 <jbossbot> git [aerogear-ios] 3147807.. Matthias Wessendorf API change on the AGStore remove, to match the AGPipe protocol; Added new tests for changed behavior

              Unassigned Unassigned
              corinnekrych_jira Corinne Krych (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: