Create an informative issue (See each section, incomplete templates/issues won't be triaged)

Using the current documentation as a model, please complete the issue template. 

Note: Doc team updates the current version and the two previous versions (n-2). For earlier versions, we will address only high-priority, customer-reported issues for releases in support.

Prerequisite: Start with what we have

related to slack question https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C0282HW2YHZ/p1700594848562929

Update 1:{}

On this link
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_advanced_cluster_management_for_kubernetes/2.9/html/business_continuity/business-cont-overview#active-passive-config

Just before the Passive hub clusters continuously retrieve section, add the following :

Note: You don't need an active-passive configuration to backup the primary hub data. You can backup the primary hub only, without the need of a passive hub being available to restore the data. In this case, you just backup the hub data and store it so that when a disaster happens you can deploy a new hub and restore this data on the new hub. An active-passive configuration reduces the time to recover when the primary hub goes down but is not a necessity.

Update 2:
On this link
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_advanced_cluster_management_for_kubernetes/2.9/html/business_continuity/business-cont-overview#prerequisites-backup-restore

Make a change in indentation shown in the attached screenshot as follows:

For passive hub clusters needs to be a subsection under For both active and passive hub clusters

The reason behind this change is that with the current indentation, it seems like Use the created secret when you create a DataProtectionApplication resource bullet ** goes under the For passive hub clusters which is not true.

Describe the changes in the doc and link to your dev story

Provide info for the following steps:

1. - [x] Mandatory Add the required version to the Fix version/s field.

2. - [ ] Mandatory Choose the type of documentation change.

      - [ ] New topic in an existing section or new section
      - [x] Update to an existing topic

3. - [ ] Mandatory for GA content:
            
       - [ ] Add steps and/or other important conceptual information here: 
       
            
       - [ ] Add Required access level for the user to complete the task here:
       

       - [ ] Add verification at the end of the task, how does the user verify success (a command to run or a result to see?)
     
     
       - [ ] Add link to dev story here:

4. - [ ] Mandatory for bugs: What is the diff? Clearly define what the problem is, what the change is, and link to the current documentation: