Uploaded image for project: 'Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management'
  1. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management
  2. ACM-24245

Update upstream pipeline for CAPx 2.10 images

XMLWordPrintable

    • Product / Portfolio Work
    • 1
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False
    • Hide

      Provide the required acceptance criteria using this template.

      • ...
      Show
      Provide the required acceptance criteria using this template. ...
    • Not Selected
    • Installer Sprint 2025-70, Installer Sprint 2025-71, Installer Sprint 2025-72
    • None

      Value Statement

      The upstream pipeline needs to be updated with 2.10 versions of all CAPx images

      Definition of Done for Engineering Story Owner (Checklist)

      • ...

      Development Complete

      • The code is complete.
      • Functionality is working.
      • Any required downstream Docker file changes are made.

      Tests Automated

      • [ ] Unit/function tests have been automated and incorporated into the
        build.
      • [ ] 100% automated unit/function test coverage for new or changed APIs.

      Secure Design

      • [ ] Security has been assessed and incorporated into your threat model.

      Multidisciplinary Teams Readiness

      • [ ] Create an informative documentation issue using the Customer

      Portal Doc template that you can access from [The Playbook](

      https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YTqpZRH54Bnn4WJ2nZmjaCoiRtqmrc2w6DdQxe_yLZ8/edit#heading=h.9fvyr2rdriby),

      and ensure doc acceptance criteria is met.

      • Call out this sentence as it's own action:
      • [ ] Link the development issue to the doc issue.

      Support Readiness

      • [ ] The must-gather script has been updated.

      -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      QE Hand Off Template (fill out when moving to Review) 10/22/25:

      Summary of the Work:
      What was implemented or fixed? Include a brief description of the problem (if applicable) and how it was addressed.
      e.g., "Updated the UI to show validation errors for the form. The previous implementation did not surface backend validation issues."

      Key Areas to Verify:

      1. What functionality should QE focus on? List what was tested or what is most important to validate.
      2. Ensure the new validation messages appear for required fields
      3. Confirm the workflow still completes as expected after validation fixes
      4. Any edge cases or high-risk areas touched by the change

      Fix or Feature Availability:
      When will this be available in a build?
      Code merged on: YYYY-MM-DD
      Expected downstream build tag (if known): example-build-tag
      (Optional) Related PR(s): Link

              cwall@redhat.com Cameron Wall
              cwall@redhat.com Cameron Wall
              Matthew Smigielski Matthew Smigielski
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: