-
Spike
-
Resolution: Done
-
Major
-
Future
-
None
-
5
-
False
-
-
False
-
-
-
SF Train-23
-
None
Epic Goal
...
Why is this important?
...
Scenarios
Ref:
https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/CTDEY6EEA/p1704361877592779
https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/GUWQE4D2N/p1701335584930869
Customer is looking for an operand to be able to set some placement rule for all the cluster 4.x and. above or 4.x and less :
something like :
clusterSelector: matchExpressions: - key: openshiftVersion operator: Greater than or equal values: -4.12 => this should match all 4.12, 4.13,
Seems that is not possible with the existent operands.
Can more operands be added such as (start with/ prefixed/include, greater than or equal etc ...) ? this could be very helpful for many use cases
Acceptance Criteria
...
Dependencies (internal and external)
- ...
Previous Work (Optional):
- ...
Open questions:
- ...
Done Checklist
- CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
- Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
- DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
Issue> - DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
Issue> - DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
- QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
- QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
- DOC - Doc issue opened with a completed template. Separate doc issue
opened for any deprecation, removal, or any current known
issue/troubleshooting removal from the doc, if applicable.
- is depended on by
-
ACM-9880 Request to add more types of operands for clusterSelector in placement rule
-
- Review
-