Uploaded image for project: 'Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management'
  1. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management
  2. ACM-13326

Known issues for cluster have missplaced entries

XMLWordPrintable

    • False
    • None
    • False
    • None

      Note: Doc team updates the current version of the documentation and the
      two previous versions (n-2), but we address *only high-priority, or
      customer-reported issues* for -2 releases in support.
      Describe the changes in the doc and link to your dev story:

      1. - [ ] Mandatory: Add the required version to the Fix version/s field.

      2. - [ ] Mandatory: Choose the type of documentation change or review.

      • [ ] We need to update to an existing topic
      • [ ] We need to add a new document to an existing section
      • [ ] We need a whole new section; this is a function not
        documented before and doesn't belong in any current section
      • [ ] We need an Operator Advisory review and approval
      • [ ] We need a z-Stream (Errata) Advisory and Release note
        for MCE and/or ACM

      3. - [ ] *Mandatory: *Use the following link to open the doc and find where the
      documentation update should go. Note: As the feature and doc is
      understood and developed, this placement decision may change:

      Please do not merge my PR, but see my PR as notes:

      https://github.com/stolostron/rhacm-docs/pull/6779

      How I caught these:

      We know that MCH is ACM, MCE is Cluster, so that is one clue we can use. If a known issue is only about OCP, we should be asking why we have it–we aren't the ones to maintain an OCP known issue, Volsync is not within MCE. There may be more that I did not catch.

      (Some of these were prob missplaced before we had MCE known issues, as they came from the Cluster section. If someone did not know the operator or the component, they may have not known where to place the known issue.)

      Then categorize the remaining based on component area such as Infrastructure Operator.

      4. - [ ] Mandatory for GA content:

      • [ ] Add steps, the diff, known issue, and/or other important
        conceptual information in the following space:
      • [ ] *Add Required access level *(example, *Cluster
        Administrator*) for the user to complete the task:
      • [ ] Add verification at the end of the task, how does the user
        verify success (a command to run or a result to see?)
      • [ ] Add link to dev story here:

      5. - [ ] Mandatory for bugs: What is the diff? Clearly define what the
      problem is, what the change is, and link to the current documentation. Only
      use this for a documentation bug.

              rh-ee-ofischer Oliver Fischer
              bswope@redhat.com Brandi Swope
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: