Epic Goal

• Context:

Created this epic to track effort against making sure ACM add-ons work as expected with HCP type clusters.

This effort was co-ordinated and opened on behalf of ACM PM (bweidenb@redhat.com ) and Hypershift add-on dev lead (rokejungrh)

• Although we test the cluster lifecycle of hypershift across different providers - Agent, Kubevirt, AWS, IBM Power / Z - there is still an untested gap: ACM add-ons on hypershift clusters.
• ACM has several different component add-ons that automatically get installed on managed clusters in ACM that we need to ensure works as expected, along with our CLC coverage:
• Application
• Governance (policy)
• Search/Observability

Why is this important?

• Customers with ACM using hosted clusters with get ACM add-ons on those hosted clusters, we need to ensure they work as expected.
• IBM Power & Z move closer to GA for hosted control planes

Scenarios

1. IBM team deploys ACM hub + a self-managed hosted cluster on IBM Z
2. ACM CI QE will trigger all component tests against the hosted cluster
3. ACM QE will triage any issues that appear
4. Repeat 1-3 with a hosted cluster on IBM Power

Acceptance Criteria

...

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

1. ...

Open questions:

1. ...

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
  Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
  Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>