Epic Goal
- Enhance the MultiClusterHub/MultiClusterEngine CR to allow for toggling on/off features that are installed by the operator
Why is this important?
- Users may want a smaller footprint and don't want to use all of the features provided by ACM. Combats FUD about size of ACM
Scenarios
- I just want Cluster Management and Search
- I just want Observability and Search
- I just want Policy
- To name but a few...
Acceptance Criteria
Include pushing metrics to RH telemetry, so we can track how these features are being toggled.
- CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
- Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
Dependencies (internal and external)
- ...
Previous Work (Optional):
- MCE is an extreme version of this
Open questions::
- If we get to a comparable size, do we rename MCE to ACM Clusters as an example.
Done Checklist
- CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
- Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
- DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
- DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
- DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
- QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
- QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
- DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>