Uploaded image for project: 'Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management'
  1. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management
  2. ACM-1005

Policy to check for operators does not integrate with OLM

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Epic
    • Resolution: Won't Do
    • Major
    • None
    • None
    • GRC
    • Policy to check for operators does not intergrate with OLM
    • False
    • False
    • ACM-33 - Multi-cluster Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC)
    • 0
    • 0% 0%

    Description

      Hi,

       I have a customer who is having issues with the following:

      Our environment is fully airgapped, so the installation and operators are available air-gapped.
      We are busy creating a policy for checking that the gatekeeper operator is installed, by following these steps:

      https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_advanced_cluster_management_for_kubernetes/2.3/html/governance/governance#managing-gatekeeper-operator-policies

      I noticed the following when defining this policy:
      - hard code image with a tag instead of shasums
      - no intergration with the OLM
      - the policy is static, so this means i have to update it every time

      After the policy was created and i pointed it to the correct shasums which is available in our registry when we sync the operators, i noticed that to install the operator i need ansible tower, which is still tech preview. Why can this product not create a namespace and subsription on the clusters it manages through the api?

      For RHACM is expected more intergration with Openshift OLM and the ability to create a subscription etc.

      The main issue for this RFE is about the integration between RHACM and the OCP OLM and the fact this function does not currently exist, please can we do this?

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            rhn-support-cstark Christian Stark
            rhn-support-andbartl Andy Bartlett
            Gus Parvin Gus Parvin
            Christian Stark Christian Stark
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: