Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift SDN'
  1. OpenShift SDN
  2. SDN-4797

improvements to iptables-alerter

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Epic Epic
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: Undefined Undefined
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • customer iptables deprecation, part 2
    • BU Product Work
    • False
    • None
    • False
    • Green
    • To Do
    • OCPSTRAT-940 - Deprecation of iptables in OpenShift [Phase 2]
    • OCPSTRAT-940Deprecation of iptables in OpenShift [Phase 2]
    • 100% To Do, 0% In Progress, 0% Done
    • ---
    • 0
    • 0

      Template:

      Networking Definition of Planned

      Epic Template descriptions and documentation

      Epic Goal

      Improvements to SDN-4114:

      • Detect iptables-legacy rules
      • Detect customer-created iptables rules in the host network namespace
      • Use a custom image (this is architecturally cleaner than the current approach of using binaries from the host filesystem, and it is necessary anyway if we want iptables-legacy binaries)

      Why is this important?

      As with SDN-4114. This will help us catch edge cases the current code does not catch.

      Planning Done Checklist

      The following items must be completed on the Epic prior to moving the Epic from Planning to the ToDo status

      • Priority+ is set by engineering
      • Epic must be Linked to a +Parent Feature
      • Target version+ must be set
      • Assignee+ must be set
      • (Enhancement Proposal is Implementable
      • (No outstanding questions about major work breakdown
      • (Are all Stakeholders known? Have they all been notified about this item?
      • Does this epic affect SD? {}Have they been notified{+}? (View plan definition for current suggested assignee)
        1. Please use the "Discussion Needed: Service Delivery Architecture Overview" checkbox to facilitate the conversation with SD Architects. The SD architecture team monitors this checkbox which should then spur the conversation between SD and epic stakeholders. Once the conversation has occurred, uncheck the "Discussion Needed: Service Delivery Architecture Overview" checkbox and record the outcome of the discussion in the epic description here.
        2. The guidance here is that unless it is very clear that your epic doesn't have any managed services impact, default to use the Discussion Needed checkbox to facilitate that conversation.

      Additional information on each of the above items can be found here: Networking Definition of Planned

      Acceptance Criteria

      • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
      • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement
        details and documents.

       

      Done Checklist

      • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
      • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
      • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
      • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
      • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
      • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

              dwinship@redhat.com Dan Winship
              dwinship@redhat.com Dan Winship
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: