Uploaded image for project: 'Red Hat Decision Manager'
  1. Red Hat Decision Manager
  2. RHDM-1369

The collect/accumulate function with expired event is sensible to the order of inserted events

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Done
    • Major
    • None
    • 7.7.1.GA
    • BRE
    • None

    Description

      If the function collect/accumulate is used in the beta node(left constraint) with expired event, it's sensible to the order of events being inserted, which should not. This issue didn't happen in bpms 6.4. It occurs in rhdm 7.x.
      For example:

      "import " + DummyEvent.class.getCanonicalName() + "\n" +
      "import " + OtherEvent.class.getCanonicalName() + "\n" +
      "import " + HashSet.class.getCanonicalName() + "\n" +
      "declare DummyEvent " +
      "@role( event ) " +
      "@timestamp( eventTimestamp )\n" +
      "@expires(0ms)" +
      "end\n" +
      "declare OtherEvent " +
      "@role( event ) " +
      "@timestamp( eventTimestamp )" +
      "@expires(2d)" +
      "end\n" +
      "rule R0 when\n" +
      " $d: OtherEvent() \n" +
      " $r: HashSet ( size >= 2 ) from collect (DummyEvent())\n" +
      "then\n" +
      " System.out.println(\"R0 Fired\");" +
      "end";

      If you insert events like:
      ksession.insert( other);
      ksession.insert( dummyEvent0 );
      ksession.insert( dummyEvent1);

      The rule gets fired. But if you inserts the events like:

      ksession.insert( dummyEvent0 );
      ksession.insert( other);
      ksession.insert( dummyEvent1);

      The rule doesn't get fired.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              mfusco@redhat.com Mario Fusco
              rhn-support-ghu Gary Hu
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: